Independence Could Benefit from Privatizing Utilities

A version of this commentary appeared in the Examiner of Jackson County.

Independence is one of the few cities in Jackson County that continues to provide extensive municipal utilities to its residents. It recently announced that is it considering the privatization of its municipal electric utility. If privatization is done in a transparent manner designed to encourage multiple bids for the electric assets and customers, it will greatly benefit the residents of Independence. In fact, the city should go even further and consider privatizing its water utility, too.

There is no standard method for providing utility services in Missouri cities. Springfield, for instance, has a city-owned public utility that provides every utility service. In Kansas City gas and electric are provided by private companies, while water service is handled by a city department. Almost all of the one million residents of Saint Louis County are customers of private companies for utility services.

Municipal utilities often charge lower rates than private utilities, but that is not the case with Independence. The city admits its municipal electric utility charges more than the private companies serving the area (mainly Evergy), despite the structural cost advantages in taxation, regulation, and financing that government-owned utilities have.

Studies have demonstrated that private utilities are generally more efficient than municipal utilities. In 2000, economist B. Delworth Gardner of Brigham Young University determined that private water utilities in Utah charged lower rates for water than comparable public utilities despite the large advantages in taxation and regulation that government utilities have. Economists Daniel Hollas and Stanley Stansell found in a 1994 study that private gas utilities were more economically efficient than public gas utilities. A recent comparison of public and private electric utilities in Florida concluded that private utilities outperformed public utilities in nine of 14 categories (with one category being equal).

It is a reasonable supposition that private utilities would be more efficient in their costs and operations than Independence’s current municipal utilities. Privatizing the utilities could benefit the city in a number of ways. Most importantly, the city would experience an immediate cash infusion from the sale. Eureka, in Saint Louis County, sold its municipal water and sewer systems to Missouri-American Water for $28 million in 2022. Independence is much larger than Eureka, and its electrical and water utilities could likely be auctioned off for a much higher price. The substantial sale proceeds could be used to continue funding vital city services, be deposited into a reserve fund, or be put to a variety of other uses that would benefit city residents.

Independence would also see other fiscal benefits from privatizing the city utilities. The assets of the newly private utilities would become taxable, expanding the Independence and Jackson County tax bases. Finally, reducing the number of municipal employees would scale back the long-run taxpayer costs associated with government pensions and health care. It is imperative, though, that the entire process be an open one to serve the interests of taxpayers and consumers.

Private utilities are just as capable of providing quality services at a low price to the residents of Independence, and likely would be more efficient than city departments. Privatization of the Independence water and electric utilities would bring a needed cash infusion to the city, add substantial assets to the tax rolls, and reduce long-term public employee costs. Cities throughout Missouri have seen positive results from such privatization efforts, and there is good reason to believe that Independence taxpayers and residents would, too.

Opportunities Squandered in St. Louis Affect All of Missouri

A version of this commentary appeared in the St. Louis Business Journal.

Opportunity cost. The concept is so simple that a first-grader could understand it. I know, because I used to teach it to first-graders. Had you walked past my classroom at just the right time, you might have heard 20-something first graders chanting, “Opportunity cost is the opportunity lost.” The students understood that our decisions have consequences. It was a lesson they learned every time they went out to recess. If they chose to play kickball, they couldn’t play basketball. This basic life lesson bears some repeating for the adults who set policy in our state.

Though the term opportunity cost was not coined until 1914, French economist and writer Frédéric Bastiat provided one of the most salient examples of the concept in his 1850 work, “What Is Seen and What Is Not Seen.” Using the parable of the broken window, Bastiat explained how money being spent on one activity is money that cannot be put to more productive use elsewhere. Imagine that a pane of glass is broken at a baker’s shop. Obviously, the money that the baker must pay to have it repaired becomes revenue for the window repair man. Anyone walking by can see the repair man doing work and recognize that he’ll be paid for his labor. But it makes no sense to look at the repair man’s good fortune in isolation. Doing so would lead to the harebrained conclusion that breaking windows leads to economic growth! Instead we need to remember that, had the window stayed intact, the baker could have done something else productive with the money. The problem is that we can’t see what the baker could have done with the money—only what he actually did with it.

Unfortunately, our board of aldermen and other policymakers regularly make decisions based on what they see without accounting for what they can’t see. Take for example the earnings tax in Saint Louis. Policymakers can see the revenue generated by the tax, but they can’t see the economic activity that has been lost. They can’t see the jobs that might have been created had those dollars been reinvested by the businesses. Nor can they see the economic activity that might have been generated if those dollars had remained in workers’ pockets.

Think about opportunity cost the next time you see a ribbon-cutting at some new development that has received tax breaks or some other form of support from the government. Whether it is a property that has been blighted and given property tax abatements for development in the Central West End or a big box store that receives tax-increment financing, we can see the product of those government actions. We cannot see the harm they do to other businesses through unfair economic competition.

I was reminded of these ideas when I read Lindenwood economist Howard Wall’s most recent paper for the Show-Me Institute, “Is Growth in Outstate Missouri Tied to Growth in the Saint Louis and Kansas City Metro Areas?” Wall uses an econometric model known as Granger-causality to estimate the impact of employment growth in Saint Louis and Kansas City on the rest of the state. He finds a statistically significant downstream relationship between Saint Louis and the rest of Missouri. That is, employment growth in Saint Louis leads to employment growth in the state. He estimates that a 1 percentage point increase in growth in Saint Louis would lead to an increase of 0.35 percentage points in outstate Missouri within two or three years. Why this connection exists (he doesn’t find a similar relationship in Kansas City) is a matter for some hypothesizing or future research. Nevertheless, the point is clear—Saint Louis is an economic driver for the state.

While Wall’s paper does not deal directly with the idea of opportunity cost, his findings make it all the more important for policymakers to understand the importance of their actions. When they support an earnings tax or other policies that harm the city’s economic growth, they are hurting the economic growth of the entire state.

Missourians, not just those who live in the city, benefit from a thriving Saint Louis economy. That’s why we need policymakers to put in place pro-growth policies that create the economic conditions for the market to thrive.

Turning the School Choice Knob Up to 11 with Matthew Ladner

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Matthew Ladner about the success of charter schools in Arizona, the growth of the open enrollment program, why it’s important for students to have options, and more.

Matthew Ladner is executive editor of redefinED. He has written numerous studies on school choice, charter schools and special education reform, and his articles have appeared in Education Next; the Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice; and the British Journal of Political Science. He is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin and received a master’s degree and a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Houston.

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Costly AND Outdated. Where Do We Sign Up?

The Bi-State Development Agency, commonly known now as Metro, is once again proposing to expand the MetroLink light rail system in St. Louis. At this time, Metro is proposing to build a north–south connector route along Jefferson Avenue in St. Louis City, with plans to eventually connect it up to North St. Louis County.

Is this plan going to be a positive step forward for the St. Louis area? No, not at all. It will be a wasteful doubling down on a failed strategy to force feed light rail into a metropolitan area that would be far better served by an improved bus system from a transportation, financial, and social perspective.

In a forthcoming paper for the Show-Me Institute, Randal O’Toole will discuss how addressing transit issues in St. Louis by expanding MetroLink is a fool’s errand, and an extremely expensive one at that. Metro’s total transit ridership in 2019 was less than it was in 1993, before MetroLink even opened. The pandemic only exacerbated this problem, with fewer jobs and workers in downtown than before. Jobs are spread out throughout the metropolitan area, and buses are well equipped to connect workers to changing jobs, students to new schools, and sports fans to games. (We can admit MetroLink does a good job with the sports teams for some—but that is hardly a justification for expanding the entire wasteful system.)

Metro would better serve our region by spending its tax money on an effective bus system, including bus rapid transit for high-volume areas, instead of expanding a costly, inefficient, and unwieldy fixed-route light-rail system that fails in its primary purpose—serving St. Louis transit users.

Kansas City Leaders Need to Get a Handle on Crime Situation—Now

Frequent Show-Me Institute readers are likely familiar with our analysts’ concerns about violent crime in St. Louis, but many of those critiques apply to the state’s largest city, Kansas City, as well. The City of Fountains is presently on pace to blow by last year’s homicide count of 171 killings, which was the city’s second highest on record. It appears Kansas City officials finally believe something has to be done about the murder problem—possibly because the Royals are hinting that they might leave the city entirely.

And what’s being done? Judging from the latest press conference held by the police chief and mayor yesterday, not much:

The Violent Crime Reduction Initiative first unveiled at a news conference in mid-May and doubled down on by officials Wednesday after the latest spike in violence involves what’s described as an aggressive collaboration between police and a host of other groups, who have ventured into some of the poorest neighborhoods to knock on doors, offering social services, and promising enhanced city services to further spread the gospel of crime prevention.

Several community activists and those working with KCPD say the new strategy encourages more collaboration between police and local organizations. But they also say it’s not all that new of a concept. Others are even less optimistic, pointing to a fractured relationship between police and the community, and a focus on criminals instead of the underlying causes of violence. [Emphasis mine]

With continuing attempts at defunding the police, city leaders have done a bang-up job of making Kansas City less safe. While I’m as big a booster as any of my hometown, it’s become increasingly isolated from the rest of the state in its effort to adopt California’s prerogatives rather than Missouri’s.

Like most things involving human interactions, Kansas City’s crime problem is complex. But it shouldn’t take, or appear to take, a professional sports team considering a new home in a neighboring city and county for Kansas City officials to get serious about their most fundamental charge of public safety. Sure, it may be more fun as a government official to show up to parades and wear construction helmets at groundbreakings, but the hard work of governing is far more mundane—and far more important—than waving a pennant during winning years and taking credit by proxy for the athletes assembled by the city’s professional sports franchises.

Kansas City officials need to get back to basics—not just to keep the Royals, but because it’s what they owe all their citizens. We’ll see if it’s too late to keep the baseball team, but to hear the governor talk about it, it’s possible that cake is already baked.

Legislature Might Look at Indy 500 Winner for Inspiration

I’ve let my feelings be known about how the 2023 legislative session went: poorly. A handful of bills that I favor passed, including one to keep men out of women’s sports. A long-discussed Interstate 70 expansion got the green light, albeit with a less-than-optimal funding approach. Beyond those items, the list of legislative failures is loooong, with no expanded school choice or transparency in education near the top.

But failure needn’t be permanent, as racecar driver Josef Newgarden showed this past weekend. While being a professional racer is an achievement in itself, Newgarden had been hounded by his inability to take the Indianapolis 500 checkered flag in his 11 attempts. But this year, on his 12th attempt, Newgarden found the winner’s circle. It was a relief compounded by years and years of frustration.

“It is mentally draining to be here for weeks and just to know that you really only have one opportunity, and it comes down to today, and that’s the day you’ve got to be perfect and great and everything has got to work out.

“So you spend all this time and effort, and it’s really just a mental grind to work through that. The more you’ve been here, the more it’s not worked out, the more that grind really starts to gnaw at you.

“I don’t necessarily subscribe to the fact that if you don’t win the 500 your career is a failure, but I think a lot of people really view this race and this championship with that lens, that the 500 stands alone – and that if you’re not able to capture one, then the career really is a failure in a lot of ways.

“I’ll be honest, it’s annoying. It’s been terrible,” said Newgarden, which also happens to describe the Missouri Legislature to a T. It has been terrible, despite the potential to do great things in the last couple years, getting close to the podium . . . but not quite to the winner’s circle.

In 2023, legislators crashed spectacularly and didn’t finish. Here’s to hoping their attempt in 2024 is, finally, victorious.

A New Normal in the Housing Market with Mark A. Calabria

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Mark A. Calabria about new mortgage regulations designed to increase equity in home ownership, if today’s housing market has echoes of the pre-2008 market, what higher interest rates for longer could mean for first-time home buyers, and more.

Mark A. Calabria is a senior advisor to the Cato Institute. He provides strategic input and direction on the federal economic policymaking process. He previously served as director of financial regulation at the Cato Institute, where he cofounded Cato’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives.

Find Mark’s latest book “Shelter from the Storm: How a COVID Mortgage Meltdown Was Averted” here: amzn.to/3ODhPVH

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging