Kevin Chavous and David Levine Commemorate Milton Friedman

On July 31, the Show-Me Institute hosted a luncheon celebrating the life and ideas of Nobel laureate economist and school choice advocate Milton Friedman. Those who attended were able to experience dynamic presentations from both Kevin Chavous, a former D.C. city councilman and current school reform leader, and Dr. David Levine, a well-known economist at Washington University.

For those who didn’t attend (or those who would like to relive the event), the video has been posted on the Show-Me Institute’s website. I encourage anybody who has even a passing interest in educational quality to watch and learn more about the issues that are facing U.S. schools today.

The video, which is also embedded below for your convenience, is a playlist consisting of eight separate parts. After each individual part has finished playing, the playlist should automatically load the subsequent part until the sequence has finished.

You may also choose to view any individual part on its own:

Part 1 (10:01) | Part 2 (9:59) | Part 3 (10:02) | Part 4 (9:53) | Part 5 (9:53) | Part 6 (9:50) | Part 7 (9:16) | Part 8 (1:47)

North Side Removal

Last night, I attended the latest NorthSide Regeneration, LLC, community meeting, along with Policy Pulse reporter Audrey Spalding (be sure to read her excellent article.) I was impressed with the presentation; the NorthSide development team has obviously spent a lot of time working on the logistics of the more than 4,000 parcels of land involved in their proposal. (You can read more about those plans on Policy Pulse.) However, aside from the generalities, many questions were left unanswered about how the development might affect the future of current area residents.

Meeting organizers requested that nobody record the proceedings, and had a few confrontations with some zealous bloggers. Arguments became heated a number of times, as community members questioned how their own properties fit into the proposed plans. Some people had seen the areas in which their houses and businesses currently stand designated as “green space” on the projected plans. Although the developer and city officials responded to some questions, others were left unanswered. The portions of the plans that are publicly available are still vague and general enough that a standard answer was that no one yet knows what will happen to a specific house or business in question, because the plans are not yet finalized.

A PowerPoint presentation provided some revealing before-and-after statistics about college education. Currently, only 3.4 percent of north side residents have a college education, compared to 15.5 percent nationally. According to NorthSide Regeneration’s presentation, they envision that 75 percent of area residents will have a college education. Not included alongside that 75-percent figure was the likelihood that such a drastic increase in college attendance figures will result not from a greater number of existing north side residents attaining higher education, but from a largely new population of better-educated residents populating the area and displacing many current residents.

Parts of the north side area are undeniably blighted, and do need work. The plans as presented showed the possibility of an attractive new community that might work well for upper-middle class residents who are looking for new parks, transit, and grocery stores within walking distance. However, although the presentation seemed designed to reassure area residents about their community’s bright future, it skirted the fact that many of the people who live there now have the most to lose from the new development, and will likely not be able to afford to continue living there if the plans proceed.

Tea Party Etiquette

Last night, Jenifer Roland (that is not a typo, she really just uses one “n”) and I were honored to be invited to address a meeting of the Meramec Township Republican Club in Southwest St. Louis County. (Think of the area around Fenton and Eureka if you are wondering where Meramec Township is.) It was a great opportunity to talk to a very large crowd about the Show-Me Institute and some of our studies. Jen gave an excellent talk about our recent health care study and touched on cap ‘n crunch trade.

I provided background about the Show-Me Institute and spoke briefly about property taxes and assessments. There were a number of Republican local elected officials there, and representatives of federal officeholders like Rep. Todd Akin and Sen. Kit Bond.

This was a township forum, not a tea party protest, but it quickly became clear that a number of tea party protesters also attended this event in order to have an opportunity to talk to some of their representatives. Here, though, the elected officials predominantly agreed with them, and the term “preaching to the choir” was used several times.

I love the tea party movement. I love that people are getting involved in their democracy. I appreciate that many tea party activists used to participate in real-world civics only through voting once — maybe twice — every four years, and now they are becoming more fully involved in the process. I would personally like to have heard a little less lecturing and condescension in some of the comments by the tea party activists last night, but you never get everything you want in life.

All in all, it was a terrific meeting and we thank Meramec Township for inviting us. Remember, Show-Me Institute staff and scholars are always available to speak about public policy to your political or civic group, of any party or affiliation.

The Model School, According to Two Million Minutes

A post on the Two Million Minutes blog reveals the subject of the newest documentary: the BASIS charter school in Arizona. Bob Compton describes the school as “low-cost, high performance, easily replicable.”

I’ve read some BASIS publications and parents’ reviews online, and it sounds like BASIS offers a challenging curriculum that most parents are very happy with.

The catch? It’s tiny. There are about a dozen students in each of the highest grades. More students attend the middle school, but there are fewer than 100 students in almost every grade. Based on the information available at publicschoolreview.com, only three percent of students are black or Hispanic.

I don’t want to imply that those facts detract from BASIS’s achievements; schools vary in size and demographic makeup. But I don’t see BASIS as an easily replicable model to improve U.S. education. The gap in test scores between whites and minorities is one of the most pressing issues education reformers grapple with, and a school that teaches few minority students doesn’t look like a promising model — unless it can show that its approach works with a diverse student body. Not only has BASIS failed to demonstrate success in closing that gap, but the school’s small size suggests that kids who are already doing well are self-selecting in. This is a common argument against lending too much credence to the high test scores that some charters achieve, and although I disagree with the argument in most cases, it’s hard to defend a school against that charge when it has only 13 kids in a grade.

In addition, BASIS’s small class sizes can’t be replicated across the U.S. school system without hiring many more teachers, which would be anything but “low cost.”

It could be that I just don’t know enough about BASIS, and that Two Million Minutes is on to something. I’ll keep following the coverage of Two Million Minutes, in case I’ve missed any evidence that the BASIS model has been scaled up.

Personal Responsibility Is the Best Medicine

Bill Maher and I can agree on something: Americans are fat and lazy.

Yesterday on the Huffington Post, Maher posted an editorial,  “New Rule: You Can’t Complain About Health Care Reform If You’re Not Willing to Reform Your Own Health.”

President Obama has identified all the problems with the health care system, but there’s one tiny issue he refuses to tackle, and that’s our actual health.

The best thing that a person can do to improve for his or her health is to abandon unhealthy habits. These are lifestyle changes that are simple and inexpensive. If a person quits smoking, he or she will even save money.

This week, the British Medical Journal published a study showing that men who stopped smoking and switched to a low-fat diet elongated their lives by an average of 10 years. The researchers followed 19,000 men, starting in the late 1960s. PLOS-Medicine published a similar study in 2008 that demonstrated a 14-year increase in longevity, not just 10, with four items only: non-smoking, daily exercise, eating vegetables and fruits, and weight control.

There is a farrago of other lifestyle changes that can positively affect a person’s longevity, such as flossing and moving to a rural area.

If Americans do not stop shirking personal responsibility for their own health, any effort at health care reform will be inefficacious.

But I suppose that it’s easier to blame fast food restaurants or the government.

How Is Service of Process Fees Like the School Funding Formula?

They are alike because the smaller counties in Missouri choose not to tax themselves to pay enough for their sheriff deputies, so the state then taxes all counties, including the larger counties that already pay their deputies a decent salary, in order to make up the disparity.

As a former St. Louis County deputy sheriff, I am uniquely qualified to comment on this story. The Political Fix has a post here about the decision in a lawsuit brought by St. Charles and St. Louis counties. Now, my own post is not a comment on the decision in the lawsuit. I have no idea whether the specific legal claims have merit. I just know that this is one more example in which the taxpayers in our larger counties have to pay higher taxes (or, in this case, a higher fee) for something because the smaller counties refuse to tax themselves enough.

I have absolutely no problem with smaller counties choosing to tax themselves less, but I do have a problem with taxing the larger counties more in order to pay employees in smaller counties more. I do not know whether this could be considered “socialism” or not, as County Executive Steve Ehlmann said, but I do know that it is terrible public policy, and blatantly biased as well.  Both county executives Ehlmann and Charlie Dooley deserve credit for fighting this new law.

Surveying Economists

The results of a new survey of members of the American Economic Association suggest that the Show-Me Institute is in good company.

The survey finds economists in consensus on several key policy issues:

  • 51.6 percent agree: “The U.S. should place more stringent caps on medical malpractice awards.”
  • 63.7 percent agree: “Barriers to entering the medical profession should be reduced.”
  • 78.3 percent agree: “Government subsidies on ethanol in the U.S. should be” reduced at least somewhat.
  • 42.4 percent agree: “State governments in the U.S. should eliminate mandates about what health insurance must cover.”
  • 62 percent disagree: “Employers in the U.S. should be required to provide health insurance to their full-time employees.”

Other interesting results:

  • 83.3 percent agree: “The U.S. should eliminate remaining tariffs and other barriers to trade.”
  • 70.3 percent agree: “The U.S. should allow payments to organ donors and their families.”

Opt-in or Opt-out?

Jonathon Braden at the Homeroom blog reports on the lingering controversy about the president’s address to students. This is from his description of a recent Columbia Board of Education meeting (emphasis mine):

Pat Fowler said she was frustrated not every student in the school district watched President Barack Obama’s address to students last Tuesday. She asked the board to pass a policy that lets parents opt out of watching a presidential address instead of opting in to view the president speak.

That’s a troubling phenomenon in uniform public schools — people fighting for the schools to impose their preferred policies on everyone else, rather than just for their own children to be able to study what parents want them to to study.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging