Charting a Path to Success

By way of Edspresso, I found an article about Chicago’s Noble charter schools:

Olsen and his staff have actually convinced kids that long school days, lots of homework and a grueling work ethic is good for them.

The curriculum requires twice as much math and twice as much reading and writing than what a regular high school requires. And when people here say, “Failure isn’t an option,” they mean it.

Read the whole thing to find out what a successful network of charters looks like.

Noble schools have done a great job of keeping kids in school and preparing them for college. They employ the time-tested methods of long school days, weekend tutoring, and high expectations that are perfectly legal options for all public schools, but for some reason are implemented only by schools like charters, that face competition.

I find it hard to temper my enthusiasm about charters like Noble. But I should note that Noble’s success story doesn’t mean all charters are great, just like a few low-achieving schools in Missouri don’t indicate the failure of charters generally. Some charters are spectacular; some are not. The more charters a state allows to open, the sooner we’ll find the best ones.

Counting Down to “Beyond Freakonomics”

Tuesday, Sept. 23, is slowly yet surely approaching, and the closer it gets, the more excited I become to hear Steven D. Levitt speak. Not only is his lecture being presented by my employer, the Show-Me Institute, but he will be speaking at my school, the John Cook School of Business at St. Louis University. I will literally have to walk only 50 yards from my apartment to hear one of my favorite contemporary authors speak in my own back yard. It doesn’t get much better than that.

Steven D. Levitt is a rock star among economists, a title that would have been an oxymoron a few years ago. The book he co-authored, Freakonomics, has taken economics out from the dark, dusty classroom and into the pop-culture spotlight. To call his work “nontraditional” or “unconventional” would be an understatement. Quite abruptly, Freakonomics has become one of the foundations of an economic education. Repeatedly, I have had professors assign different sections of the book as in-class readings. I cannot recommend this book highly enough to anyone, whether or not they have a background or interest in economics. Then again, I’m posting on a free-market economic think tank blog, so I’m sure those reading this are familiar with Freakonomics.

Since beginning my study of economics at SLU a few years ago, people have suggested I read Freakonomics, but I didn’t take the time to do so till this past summer. Frankly, I wish I had gotten around to reading it sooner. The book analyzes topics I would never have dreamed to associate with economics, such as sumo wrestling results and inner-city gang financing. Levitt successfully shows that there is a transparent economic layer to nearly anything you can imagine. Levitt’s speech on the 23rd promises to be both entertaining and thought-provoking. I could try to predict the topics he will cover, but I believe such an efforts would be in vein. Nothing at this point would surprise me. I would be in a state of euphoria if I heard any official news about the Internet rumors concerning a possible sequel, Superfreakonomics.

If you have not yet read Freakonomics, I highly advise it. Don’t forget to check out the details of the speech, and to register. Be advised that seats are going fast.

The talk will be held Tuesday, September 23rd, an the Anheuser-Busch Auditorium in the lower level of the John Cook School of Business at St. Louis University. I hope to see you there.

The Future of Missouri Health Care

New Census Bureau statistics show that, from 2005 to 2007, the number of Missouri children without health insurance increased by 44 percent. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, “Anecdotal evidence suggests [that the percentage] has continued to grow this year as the economy softened and unemployment hit a 16-year high.” This is not too surprising.

As the Missouri Governor’s race heats up, the future of our health care is taking center stage. Both candidates have outlined their own health care plans:

No matter what happens come election time, both candidates have some major shoes to fill and issues to fix. Nonetheless, they would do well not to stray too far from the innovative free-market health care refrom that put Missouri on the policy map last year.

Blog Post About the Blog

This post is going to be strictly about our blog itself, sort of like an adult movie plot that revolves around people trying to make an adult movie. (People with lesser morals than I tell me that this is a common plot device in such films.) Our blog was a little light on new posts during the past week or so, for two reasons. First, many of us were in Arizona for a conference last week, and second, I have been having significant computer troubles that finally appear to be fixed. We are back up to full strength this week, and for the foreseeable future.

As Eric has already noted, and which was followed up by a comment on his post, our blog was credited at the conference we were attending as an example of a very good state-based policy blog. I take great pride in that — everyone here does.

Our readers may not realize how hard it can be to write about policy without politics, and ideology without partisanship. Do you know how hard it is not to write about elections during election season? We hope we are succeeding, though. We are committed to doing this for two reasons: First, it’s the law, because we are a tax-exempt organization at the federal, state, and local levels, with the resulting limitations that status imposes. Second — and you may not believe this, but this reason is actually more important — we want to be thought of as serious writers by people on all sides of the political spectrum. It takes only one example — one simple post — where you put partisan beliefs or goals before logical, consistent, researched argument, and a whole group of people are going to write you off forever, and deservedly so.

Don’t think for a second that I don’t have partisan beliefs. I do. But while on the job at the Show-Me Institute, and while posting on this blog, every writer here is going to subordinate those beliefs to the larger effort of arguing for market solutions to Missouri problems. That is how we are going to be relevant and effective in Missouri over the long-term. Plus, I don’t want to get fined or fired — that, too …

So please keep reading, and please post more, and let us know what we can be doing better.

National Education Blog

For a couple of weeks now, I’ve been following “Schoolhouse Rock,” an education blog at Slate.com. Paul Tough, the blog’s writer, seems to be working hard to bring a balanced discussion of education reform efforts, and I think his work would be a useful information outlet to help anyone who is interested in fixing the failing schools in our own state keep up with what is being said about reform efforts nationwide.

Shout Out From Nasturtium Squids

Err… Tertium Quids, that is, a policy group based in Virginia. Today, at the State Policy Network‘s annual meeting in Scottsdale, Ariz., I finally met Norm Leahy, vice president of public affairs for Tertium Quids (which I’m told means “third way” in Latin). Norm and I are both refugees from several years at U.S. Term Limits, although he left before I started my 5.5-year tenure there. Although we have lots of friends and acquaintances in common, we’ve never met before today.

As it turns out, Norm is a big fan of Show-Me Daily, and has linked to us from the Tertium Quids blog for quite a while. At any rate, in today’s SPN conference session about blogging, at which Norm was a panelist, he singled out Show-Me Daily as one of the best think tank blogs he’s seen. That’s no faint praise, because there are a lot of groups out there doing excellent work.

It’s been awhile since I spent much time in Virginia, although I did live there for a couple of years during my DC Beltway days. It’s good to know folks like Norm Leahy are holding down the fort.

Webster County at Risk of Being Sucked Dry by Ethanol

On Wednesday, an appellate court heard arguments about the proposed $165 million ethanol plant for Webster County. The Springfield News-Leader highlights the case. What it basically comes down to is an ongoing feud between Gulfstream Bioflex Energy (GPE) and The Citizens for Groundwater Protection (CGP). This is the second Missouri plant that the two groups have fought over, the first fight occurring in 2006.

The CGP is afraid of the amount of water the ethanol plant will suck from the surrounding area, a fear that is eerily similar to Spaceballs, although, to be fair, Spaceball One was after oxygen — not water. Besides the fear of water shortages in their personal wells, Webster County residents are also resistant to the amount of pollution the plant would create, making any remaining water unusable.

Does Missouri really need more ethanol right now? I won’t go into the details that have been outlined many times before, but ethanol is not the key for Missouri’s energy. Already, we are too bogged down by it with our E-10 ethanol mandate. The new plant will not only hit residents economically with increased fuel and food costs, but will also literally have their life source cut off.

Be sure to read the Show-Me Institute’s case study, “The Economic Impact of The Missouri E-10 Ethanol Mandate.”

Expect Road Delays

I apologize, Missourians. There will be road delays in the near future, and I’m not talking about traffic. According to an article in the Joplin Globe, the Federal Highway Trust Fund is running short on money, thus delaying or even canceling road/bridge projects in Missouri. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation has asked Congress for an $8 billion increase in funding for the Federal Highway Trust Fund, to assist with financing highway projects. If Congress can not accumulate the funds, Missouri could lose $252 million, translating to 8,770 jobs. Wow — as if our economy hasn’t already taken a hit.

This blow to our economy is something that I cannot take lightly. According to Scott Bachman, planner for MoDOT Joplin’s regional office:

“We’re hoping Congress will come up with a short-term solution, now that it’s back from the August recess. In the meantime, we’ll watch how much revenue comes into the highway trust fund and how much they pay out in ratio to the funding coming in.”

I’m sorry, but I do not want to wait in traffic and put the fate of our state’s roads in the hands of Congress. This would be a great opportunity for Missourians to flex our muscles and take the situation into our own hands. Tolling and private financing could be major options.

During one of my first weeks here in the Show-Me Institute office, one of our policy analysts (I will give you a hint) asked whether I knew the only tolled transportation facility in Missouri? Clearly, I did not know the answer. To my surprise, it was the Lake of the Ozarks Community Bridge, built in 1998. This is the only one. As a graduate student at Brandeis University (located in Waltham, Mass.), I am lucky to pass only two toll facilities (versus four or five) just to get into Boston! I really think we should keep our options open to public-private partnerships. Either that, or wait for Congress to find that pot of gold under the rainbow.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging