Tea Party Etiquette

Last night, Jenifer Roland (that is not a typo, she really just uses one “n”) and I were honored to be invited to address a meeting of the Meramec Township Republican Club in Southwest St. Louis County. (Think of the area around Fenton and Eureka if you are wondering where Meramec Township is.) It was a great opportunity to talk to a very large crowd about the Show-Me Institute and some of our studies. Jen gave an excellent talk about our recent health care study and touched on cap ‘n crunch trade.

I provided background about the Show-Me Institute and spoke briefly about property taxes and assessments. There were a number of Republican local elected officials there, and representatives of federal officeholders like Rep. Todd Akin and Sen. Kit Bond.

This was a township forum, not a tea party protest, but it quickly became clear that a number of tea party protesters also attended this event in order to have an opportunity to talk to some of their representatives. Here, though, the elected officials predominantly agreed with them, and the term “preaching to the choir” was used several times.

I love the tea party movement. I love that people are getting involved in their democracy. I appreciate that many tea party activists used to participate in real-world civics only through voting once — maybe twice — every four years, and now they are becoming more fully involved in the process. I would personally like to have heard a little less lecturing and condescension in some of the comments by the tea party activists last night, but you never get everything you want in life.

All in all, it was a terrific meeting and we thank Meramec Township for inviting us. Remember, Show-Me Institute staff and scholars are always available to speak about public policy to your political or civic group, of any party or affiliation.

The Model School, According to Two Million Minutes

A post on the Two Million Minutes blog reveals the subject of the newest documentary: the BASIS charter school in Arizona. Bob Compton describes the school as “low-cost, high performance, easily replicable.”

I’ve read some BASIS publications and parents’ reviews online, and it sounds like BASIS offers a challenging curriculum that most parents are very happy with.

The catch? It’s tiny. There are about a dozen students in each of the highest grades. More students attend the middle school, but there are fewer than 100 students in almost every grade. Based on the information available at publicschoolreview.com, only three percent of students are black or Hispanic.

I don’t want to imply that those facts detract from BASIS’s achievements; schools vary in size and demographic makeup. But I don’t see BASIS as an easily replicable model to improve U.S. education. The gap in test scores between whites and minorities is one of the most pressing issues education reformers grapple with, and a school that teaches few minority students doesn’t look like a promising model — unless it can show that its approach works with a diverse student body. Not only has BASIS failed to demonstrate success in closing that gap, but the school’s small size suggests that kids who are already doing well are self-selecting in. This is a common argument against lending too much credence to the high test scores that some charters achieve, and although I disagree with the argument in most cases, it’s hard to defend a school against that charge when it has only 13 kids in a grade.

In addition, BASIS’s small class sizes can’t be replicated across the U.S. school system without hiring many more teachers, which would be anything but “low cost.”

It could be that I just don’t know enough about BASIS, and that Two Million Minutes is on to something. I’ll keep following the coverage of Two Million Minutes, in case I’ve missed any evidence that the BASIS model has been scaled up.

Personal Responsibility Is the Best Medicine

Bill Maher and I can agree on something: Americans are fat and lazy.

Yesterday on the Huffington Post, Maher posted an editorial,  “New Rule: You Can’t Complain About Health Care Reform If You’re Not Willing to Reform Your Own Health.”

President Obama has identified all the problems with the health care system, but there’s one tiny issue he refuses to tackle, and that’s our actual health.

The best thing that a person can do to improve for his or her health is to abandon unhealthy habits. These are lifestyle changes that are simple and inexpensive. If a person quits smoking, he or she will even save money.

This week, the British Medical Journal published a study showing that men who stopped smoking and switched to a low-fat diet elongated their lives by an average of 10 years. The researchers followed 19,000 men, starting in the late 1960s. PLOS-Medicine published a similar study in 2008 that demonstrated a 14-year increase in longevity, not just 10, with four items only: non-smoking, daily exercise, eating vegetables and fruits, and weight control.

There is a farrago of other lifestyle changes that can positively affect a person’s longevity, such as flossing and moving to a rural area.

If Americans do not stop shirking personal responsibility for their own health, any effort at health care reform will be inefficacious.

But I suppose that it’s easier to blame fast food restaurants or the government.

How Is Service of Process Fees Like the School Funding Formula?

They are alike because the smaller counties in Missouri choose not to tax themselves to pay enough for their sheriff deputies, so the state then taxes all counties, including the larger counties that already pay their deputies a decent salary, in order to make up the disparity.

As a former St. Louis County deputy sheriff, I am uniquely qualified to comment on this story. The Political Fix has a post here about the decision in a lawsuit brought by St. Charles and St. Louis counties. Now, my own post is not a comment on the decision in the lawsuit. I have no idea whether the specific legal claims have merit. I just know that this is one more example in which the taxpayers in our larger counties have to pay higher taxes (or, in this case, a higher fee) for something because the smaller counties refuse to tax themselves enough.

I have absolutely no problem with smaller counties choosing to tax themselves less, but I do have a problem with taxing the larger counties more in order to pay employees in smaller counties more. I do not know whether this could be considered “socialism” or not, as County Executive Steve Ehlmann said, but I do know that it is terrible public policy, and blatantly biased as well.  Both county executives Ehlmann and Charlie Dooley deserve credit for fighting this new law.

Surveying Economists

The results of a new survey of members of the American Economic Association suggest that the Show-Me Institute is in good company.

The survey finds economists in consensus on several key policy issues:

  • 51.6 percent agree: “The U.S. should place more stringent caps on medical malpractice awards.”
  • 63.7 percent agree: “Barriers to entering the medical profession should be reduced.”
  • 78.3 percent agree: “Government subsidies on ethanol in the U.S. should be” reduced at least somewhat.
  • 42.4 percent agree: “State governments in the U.S. should eliminate mandates about what health insurance must cover.”
  • 62 percent disagree: “Employers in the U.S. should be required to provide health insurance to their full-time employees.”

Other interesting results:

  • 83.3 percent agree: “The U.S. should eliminate remaining tariffs and other barriers to trade.”
  • 70.3 percent agree: “The U.S. should allow payments to organ donors and their families.”

Opt-in or Opt-out?

Jonathon Braden at the Homeroom blog reports on the lingering controversy about the president’s address to students. This is from his description of a recent Columbia Board of Education meeting (emphasis mine):

Pat Fowler said she was frustrated not every student in the school district watched President Barack Obama’s address to students last Tuesday. She asked the board to pass a policy that lets parents opt out of watching a presidential address instead of opting in to view the president speak.

That’s a troubling phenomenon in uniform public schools — people fighting for the schools to impose their preferred policies on everyone else, rather than just for their own children to be able to study what parents want them to to study.

Single-Sex Charters Expand in New York; Will Missouri Be Next?

Single-sex classrooms have caught on in public districts and charter schools in Missouri, so I would expect single-sex charters to appeal here too. It’s true that Missouri’s charter school law forbids discrimination by sex in admissions, but Illinois has a similar law that hasn’t prevented single-sex charters from opening. (No boys have applied to the girls’ schools in Illinois, and vice versa.)

The most recent news about single-sex charters is from New York City: PublicPrep, which operates two all-girls charters, will open two more for girls and one for boys during the next two years. This radio news program interviews some parents as well as a principal. According to the report, 700 families applied for just 132 openings in the Bronx GirlsPrep school.

I’m impressed that the Lower East Side GirlsPrep school teaches Spanish to third graders, even though PublicPrep has no foreign language focus. This is an example of a charter going above and beyond what it would need to provide in order to fulfill its mission — namely, a single-sex learning environment. Charter schools are not slaves to test prep, nor do their themes constrain them from offering a range of subjects.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging