Radio Free North County

I promise this will be the last post of police radio dispatching for some time, but the Post-Dispatch had another story on it today.  I am not going to talk about the dispute in the attached article, other than saying people should pay their bills and avoid conflicts of interest.  The nugget I am interested in is the radio consortium operated by the police departments of Pine Lawn, Wellston, Pagedale, Kinloch and Beverly Hills.  Kudos to them for sharing this system for years and saving money for taxpayers, beyond just the money saved by not paying rent to Normandy School District.  A bit of research shows me that most of the above cities contract with St. Louis County for electrical and plumbing inspections, which is also a good example of consolidation.  Kinloch has, for all intents and purposes, stopped providing government services to its 449 people, other than arresting airport contractors trying to clean up trash within the city.  For that it thinks it needs a full time mayor, but that is another issue. 

Back to the radio consortium.  In the interest of their citizens, these five cities, and many others in the near-north area, should follow this small example and either merge into one municipality or, better yet, disincorporate entirely and let St. Louis County provide all these services to the residents of this area for less tax money than they currently pay.  For small, poor cities, disincorporation is a true win-win situation, but it will still never happen ’cause the police chiefs and mayors like their jobs to much.         

I first I thought this was a good thing…

When I first read that Brentwood had lowered its emergency dispatching bid for Rock Hill by $100,000, I thought this might be an excellent and all-too rare example of municipal cooperation.  Its a good thing that Brentwood contracts out its services to a neighboring muni to avoid duplication, right?  Well, yes, of course it is.  But if you read the entire article you realize that a better option is staring right at both Brentwood and Rock Hill.  Both cities could join the East Central Dispatch system that began in 2004 as a far-sighted consolidation of services by Clayton, Richmond Heights, Maplewood, Webster Groves and Shrewsbury.  Brentwood’s bid may have been $15,000 lower to Rock Hill than EC Dispatch’s, but if both cities joined that latter bid would likely be even lower.  That does not even get into the savings Brentwood might see by eliminating its dispatching service and contracting with EC Dispatch.

In order to keep Rock Hill as part of their own dispatching service, Brentwood raised taxes by $56,000 to cover the cost of the lower bid!  Mayor Kelly (Brentwood) is one of the best mayors in St. Louis County, but he needs to ditch the dispatch and both Brentwood and Rock Hill should join East Central Dispatch faster than an ambulance can make it from St. Mary’s to South Webster.  Although with the coming I-64/40 work, maybe they should do it faster than that.    

Don’t Drain the Sales Tax Pool

What does every city with a recent eminent domain controversy in Saint Louis County have in common? They are all “point-of-sale” cities, which keep the majority of sales taxes they collect under the County’s complicated sales tax distribution formula. Legislation has been introduced in Jefferson City that would exacerbate the problem. It would change the way sales taxes are distributed in Saint Louis County and revert back to the system that existed prior to 1994, which would have even greater potential for eminent-domain abuse. Abandoning the so-called “Westfall Plan” would be a mistake with serious repercussions for economic development.

In the early 1990s, Buzz Westfall and the County Council addressed the inequities in the collection and dispersion of sales taxes within Saint Louis County. At the time, cities with significant retail had their own sales taxes and kept all of the money. After difficult negotiations, a compromise was reached and Saint Louis County now has a countywide sales tax and a shared tax pool with point-of-sale, (or “A”) and “pool” (or “B”) cities. A cities keep the majority of their sales taxes but are required to share a portion with the pool. The rest of the county turns over all the sales taxes they collect to the pool, which is then redistributed to the B cities, which includes unincorporated Saint Louis County, based on population. Not surprisingly, A cities tend to be places with significant retail while the B cities have limited retail or large populations. The proposed legislation would end this system in 2008, allowing A cities to again keep all of the sales tax money they collect.

The current system acknowledges the fact that most shoppers going to the Galleria don’t live in Richmond Heights. It also benefits the business environment in our area by rewarding non-retail economic development. If Webster Groves attracts a new corporate headquarters, that would clearly generate significant new sales taxes for the area based on the new jobs and employees brought to the region. Why should a neighboring A city with significant shopping, such as Brentwood, keep all of the sales taxes generated within Brentwood by the new employees of that Webster Groves company? Eliminating the pool contributions of A cities would further press all cities to search for ways to increase sales taxes and grow retail development at the expense of other modes of the economy, such as finance and manufacturing, which generate the salaries used to go shopping in the first place.

That pressure to increase the retail economy, as opposed to other types of development, is one of the main reasons behind the eminent domain abuses we have seen in recent years in Saint Louis County. It is not a coincidence that all of the controversial eminent domain actions in Saint Louis County have occurred in A cities such as Sunset Hills, Manchester, Rock Hill and Clayton. Residential areas such as the one at issue in Sunset Hills have more tax value to B cities, where a city’s population is a significant factor in the amount received from the pool.

The argument in favor of allowing A cities to keep all of the sales tax would be stronger if those cities were responsible for all the infrastructure that supported the development. However, the primary shopping areas are, for obvious reasons, located along major roadways. Those roadways are usually state or county roads that taxpayers throughout Saint LouisCounty pay to maintain, not just the municipalities they run through. There are other examples, such as fire department mutual aid agreements, that demonstrate the interconnected nature of local government in Saint Louis County and argue for keeping the current sales tax pool distribution system.

In the interest of property owners, the contributions of A cities to the sales tax pool should be maintained. All types of industry and commerce benefit our community, not just retail sales outlets. If anything, the pool should be expanded further so that all cities would benefit from development throughout the county, not just within their own borders. The current system helps to relieve the pressure on local governments to constantly generate more sales tax dollars by any means necessary and preserve the property rights so central to the rights of free people.

 

 

David Stokes is a writer living in University City.

 

Stokes on the Sales Tax Pool

Over at our main website, David Stokes has a new article on a proposal to abolish the sales tax pool in Saint Louis County. In short: he thinks it’s a bad idea:
 

The current system acknowledges the fact that most shoppers going to the Galleria don’t live in Richmond Heights. It also benefits the business environment in our area by rewarding non-retail economic development. If Webster Groves attracts a new corporate headquarters, that would clearly generate significant new sales taxes for the area based on the new jobs and employees brought to the region. Why should a neighboring A city with significant shopping, such as Brentwood, keep all of the sales taxes generated within Brentwood by the new employees of that Webster Groves company? Eliminating the pool contributions of A cities would further press all cities to search for ways to increase sales taxes and grow retail development at the expense of other modes of the economy, such as finance and manufacturing, which generate the salaries used to go shopping in the first place.

That pressure to increase the retail economy, as opposed to other types of development, is one of the main reasons behind the eminent domain abuses we have seen in recent years in Saint Louis County. It is not a coincidence that all of the controversial eminent domain actions in Saint Louis County have occurred in A cities such as Sunset Hills, Manchester, Rock Hill and Clayton. Residential areas such as the one at issue in Sunset Hills have more tax value to B cities, where a city’s population is a significant factor in the amount received from the pool.

It’s a great article, so you should click here to read the whole thing.

Its beginning to feel a lot like reassessment…

Reassessment season is here.  This is good news for government entities, real estate appraisers and bloggers who like to write about local tax issues.  It is bad news for everyone else.  The traditional start, the first-pitch if you will, of reassessment season is the article by the Post-Dispatch announcing the mailing, accompanied by the school district breakdown, which serves the role of the opening day starting pitcher.  This year’s Post article, very well done as always by Clay Barbour, is here.  My first reaction to the news of large increases in value was a double-take, as everyone is well aware that the real estate market has been terrible for the past year.  Maybe they mostly used 2005 sales, but I think people who appeal will be able to have a great deal of success by finding lower values from very recent sales or, better yet, depending on your point of view, introducing evidence of the many homes throughout our area that have not sold at all.  Feel free to e-mail your horror stories of homes that increase in value by 90% when their neighbors all go up 10% to [email protected].  You can rest assured that I will follow this closely and don’t be afraid to appeal your assessment if you think it is warranted!

MOHELA Deal Is Like Girl Scout Cookies for Politicians

The MOHELA deal is back and better than ever…or not. The proposal orginally intended to take $350 million in assets and spend it on capital improvement projects for Missouri’s public universities. A large chunk of this appropriation was intended to fund a number of projects relating to the biotech industry. Political pressure derailed that version of the project, forcing Governor Blunt and his cohorts to rethink the distribution of those funds. Well they’re back with a new list, which can be viewed here, and, not surprisingly, the biotech proposals are gone.

The new list has received somewhat mixed reviews: Republicans are mostly for it, Democrats are mostly against it. I’m a little miffed, as I thought the proposal was originally about creating jobs in a growing industry with great promise. Now, however, that part of the bill has been largely eliminated, and replaced with more mundane projects. I’m also curious about what happened to that assessment by that private firm that found the deal could seriously undermine MOHELA’s financial health and ability to continue providing loans to Missouri students. This assessment drew attention to pending federal changes to the Higher Education Act, due to sunset this summer. It seems a little hasty to push this controversial proposal too hard when we don’t know how the federal law might change or how those changes might impact Missouri and MOHELA.

Without the long term, lucrative jobs the biotech measures would have created, I’m not sure what Missouri has to gain, beyond the obvious brownie points politicians stand to score in districts receiving the funds. Capital improvement projects are great, but only to the extent that students can afford to attend those schools and utilitize those improvements. With the ever-increasing cost of higher education in this state and others, I’m not sure this is the best way to spend our money at this time. Ultimately we need to be careful, and should at least wait until the federal government does its job before moving forward with any proposal.

The Unintended Consequences of Minimum Wage Laws

The minimum wage is hurting colleges and universities in Missouri:

Kelley said she’s happy to follow the mandate of the people; she just wishes it came with some instruction on how departments are supposed to stretch their budgets.

“This is an unfunded mandate from the masses,” she said. “No additional funds come with it, just the instructions to do it.

The article describes how colleges must now pay higher wages to the students who work in their department offices for a few hours a week.

Minimum wage laws are supposedly on the books to help poor, working families–not students who are saving their money for spring break. This is the perfect example of how the laws misfire.

In contrast, the Earned Income Tax Credit helps only the poor and doesn’t disproportionately burden any particular businesses or nonprofits.

A Mean-spirited Letter on Parental Choice

A letter to the editor in today’s Post shows the ugly, mean-spirited attitude of some opponents of parental choice:
 

Regarding “School tax credits die in state House” (March 8): Missouri House Speaker Rod Jetton, R-Marble Hill, never ceases to amaze me. His support of a Missouri House bill to give tax credits to send urban kids to private schools is a slap in the face to the rural school districts he is supposed to represent. The article said that this bill could cost the state up to $40 million in tax credits.

As House speaker, it is a testament to his poor leadership that 35 Republican representatives voted against the bill. Thank goodness the bill was defeated. I live in Mr. Jetton’s district. The only good thing about that is that he is term-limited and cannot serve another term as a state representative. Maybe next time around we can get a representative who cares more about the needs of rural schools than making a career in politics.

There are several problems with this argument. First, the state of Missouri spends about $5 billion per year on K-12 education each year, so the $40 million price tag amounts to less than one percent of the state budget. I wonder if Mr. Page writes letters to the editor every time the legislature spends $40 million in an effort to help inner-city kids.

Second, if the author’s point is that rural taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to subsidize the education of inner-city kids, he’s long since lost that battle. The state already pays significantly more per-pupil to the Saint Louis and Kansas City school districts than they do elsewhere in the state. Saint Louis receives $5500 per pupil from the state, compared with only $4200 per pupil for the author’s hometown of Fredericktown.

Most importantly, the author fails to consider the fact that the cost to the state of his program would be far less than $40 million. It’s true that the HB808 would issue up to $40 million in tax credits. However, many of the scholarships distributed as part of the tax credit program would go to kids who otherwise would have gone to public schools. Some (or depending on the details, potentially all) of the costs of the tax credit program would be offset by savings due to the fact that the state had to educate fewer kids through the public schools. So the true cost of the tax credit program would be substantially less than $40 million.

If the author is truly worried about threats to his pocketbook, he should be writing letters to the editor about the so-called adequacy lawsuit now wending its way through the court system. That could mandate billions of dollars in additional spending. And worst of all, it would require that all of the money be given to the same public schools that have squandered so many millions already. If there’s one thing that’s worse than being forced to pay for the education of other peoples’ kids, it’s being forced to pay for an ineffective effort to educate other peoples’ kids.

We Don’t Need More Clinics in Schools

Do health clinics belong in public schools? The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that the idea hasn’t taken hold in Missouri as it has in Illinois:

The Metro East area has two of these high school clinics, the one in East St. Louis and another in Cahokia.

In contrast, the whole state of Missouri has just three, according to the National Assembly on School-Based Health Care, a nonprofit group in Washington.

Providing preventative health care to poor children is imperative, but attaching the service to public schools is the wrong way to go. The existing system of public schools excacerbates disparities in education, because the children with the fewest choices are stuck in the worst schools. If a child’s health care provider also depends on his address, we’ll have greater health care injustice.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging