Prioritizing Political Ideology over Educational Outcomes

Education |
By Susan Pendergrass | Read Time 2 min

Nikole Hannah-Jones made headlines with her personal confession in The New York Times Magazine: “In Fighting for Every Black Child, Did I Betray My Own?” A decade ago, driven by an ideological commitment to public education and integration, she enrolled her daughter in a struggling Brooklyn public school. Now 16, her daughter delivered a painful verdict. She believes her mother made the wrong choice, sacrificing her academic potential for an institutional ideal.

The core tragedy running through Hannah-Jones’s retrospective is the permanent loss of time. Systems can endure decades of failure and survive in a way that children cannot. For example, once a student falls behind in reading by third grade, catching up becomes an uphill battle that can alter the trajectory of their entire life. And, sadly, that is what happens for over 40 percent of Missouri 4th graders.

In Jefferson City, legislative debates over school choice often turn into battles between special interest groups, union lobbyists, and trade associations. Lost in the technical jargon of funding formulas and accreditation benchmarks is the actual student sitting in a classroom where they are not learning.

Hannah-Jones’s daughter saw clearly what many policymakers ignore. Adult political battles should never be waged at the expense of vulnerable children. When people demand that families stay put to support a district’s balance sheet, they are asking children to bear the burden of systemic dysfunction.

Missouri has a constitutional and moral obligation to ensure its youth are educated, but that obligation is owed to children, not the brick-and-mortar buildings. Universal education savings accounts (ESAs), robust charter expansion, and interdistrict open enrollment are practical policy tools that can help deliver that promise.

Parents know when their children are struggling, when a curriculum is failing, and when a school culture is detrimental. Missouri lawmakers must heed the quiet truth behind Hannah-Jones’s words and not force another generation of Missouri parents to look back and wonder if their loyalty to a system cost their children their future.

Thumbnail image credit: Structured Vision / Shutterstock
Susan Pendergrass

About the Author

Before joining the Show-Me Institute, Susan Pendergrass was Vice President of Research and Evaluation for the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, where she oversaw data collection and analysis and carried out a rigorous research program. Susan earned a Bachelor of Science degree in...

Similar Stories

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging