Realism is a Good Thing…

My love of trains has been discussed before. However, in a recently released study recommending against adding an Amtrak line connecting Saint Louis to Springfield (MO), the State Department of Transportation and Amtrak seem to have sided with common-sense and the free-market. Subsidizing a train connecting your two largest cities with the State Capitol is one thing, but adding to that without the market demand would be poor policy and even worse economics. Not to mention the increased subsidy required might jeapordize the one existing route. Much more important is connecting St. Louis to New Orleans without a required bus ride to Carbondale. Maybe the market would support it, maybe not, but this is New Orleans we are talking about here for christsakes… 

A Contract to Reconsider

The St. Louis School Board may reconsider its contract to bash the charter schools:

School Board member David Jackson said Wednesday that he would seek to place the contract on the agenda for the board’s June 12 meeting and will change his vote.

"I don’t want to pay $25,000 to dog another entity," said Jackson, one of four board members who supported the contract. He now prefers the money be spent to promote the city schools rather than denounce charter schools.

And here’s the Board Vice President explaining why he favored the contract:

"This is an emergency," Purdy said. "We had to reach out to the parents making the decisions about where to send their children now. By August it will be too late."

The School Board seems to have gotten the message that parents will go elsewhere if they have the choice. What the district doesn’t realize is that advertising alone won’t keep students in the district. Parents aren’t flocking to charter schools because of a few commercials.   

If the St. Louis Public Schools want to retain students, they should improve their product. Public schools in the suburbs don’t have to advertise; everyone knows which ones are the best from word of mouth.

Blinded by the Blight

George Orwell famously warned about the use of political terminology to obscure meaning, rather than to reveal or enlighten. It’s a problem that continues today, as I was reminded by an article in the Springfield News-Leader:

Commercial Street business owners are working to improve that area’s image — but to get needed tax help, they may have to put up with the label "blighted."

Mike MacPherson, senior planner with the city of Springfield, supports using tax-increment financing — available only to areas officially designated as "blighted" — to pay for changes on Commercial such as more parking and outdoor stages. TIF uses tax revenue collected from new development to fund projects beneficial to the public in those areas.

MacPherson said Commercial Street is blighted under any definition. About half the buildings on the street are vacant. Most are deteriorating.

But the ominous-sounding label does not mean supporters are wrong to say Commercial Street conditions are improving, according to MacPherson.

An area in which things are improving is labeled as blighted. A quick look at any dictionary will reveal definitions for "blight" such as these: "something that frustrates plans or hopes," "something that impairs or destroys," or "a deteriorated condition." If the vacant buildings on Commercial Street were gradually destroying the area, making things continually worse over time, the area could be called blighted. But even if there are negative aspects, an area can’t be called blighted if it’s improving despite them. That’s the opposite of blight.

The article continues:

Lyle Foster, owner of Big Momma’s Coffee and Espresso Bar at 217 E. Commercial, has worked to change negative perceptions about the street.

At a recent news conference, he listed a number of improvements made in the last two years: over $4 million in investment, "green" building initiatives, 25 lofts now under development and 40 lofts completed and occupied.

This is the sort of development that actual blighted areas would never see. The term is also being misapplied right here in Clayton, as David Stokes noted last week.

It’s an abuse of language to look at a healthy, thriving area and call it "blighted" just because it’s not doing quite as well as you think it could under different ownership. Using that terminology to obscure truth and then take people’s property through eminent domain provisions is an abuse of justice.

Pop Quiz

The St. Louis School Board has decided to spend more money on:

a) New textbooks and computers.

b) Hiring better-qualified teachers in hard-to-staff subjects like math and science.

c) Repairing old school buildings.

d) A PR campaign to slander the charter schools.

Answer: d. That’s right, the St. Louis School Board has hired a marketing firm for $25,000 to publicize the "negative impact of charter schools."

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch article notes that the School Board didn’t take bids for this contract. Surprise, surprise. It’s not exactly like they’re enthusiastic about the benefits of competition.

What is the true value of a taxi medallion in St. Louis?

In New York City, the value of a taxi medallion, simply a license to operate a taxi cab, is $477,000. That is an amazing sum, but certainly understandable by the law of supply and demand. The demand for taxis is always high in NYC, and with Mayor Bloomberg’s proposal to dramatically increase the tax/tolls to enter Manhattan via car, it is likely to grow even higher. As for the supply, NYC limits the number of licenses available, so it does not take a genius to see why the prices of medallions are outpacing other investments in New York.

Here in St. Louis we have the Metropolitan Taxicab Commission. While I don’t like all the regulations it has for cabs (the dress code for drivers is particulaly stupid), it is certainly preferable to the system in place before its establishment in 2003. Before then, the county and city each regulated their own cabs and prevented crossover, so a county cab could pick someone up in the county and take them to the city, but then was not allowed to pick up a fare in the city. So the current system is at least a little better. 

Unlike NYC, St. Louis does not, as far as I can tell, set a numerical limit on the number of licensed taxis. This is a good thing from a free-market perspective, but the commission does have broad powers to deny new licenses if it feels the market is currently being met with existing licenses. As the commission is largely composed of people with direct involvement in the taxi industry, the potential for limiting the number of competitors by limiting new licenses is certainly there. 

The cost for a taxi license in St. Louis is $55 per year. Judging by how hard it is to get a cab in St. Louis, I’d say there is not exactly a line forming (pun intended) to drive that value up. In NYC it is $477,000 for a medallion. That is an 867,172-percent greater value. Based on my perceptions of the cab industries in both towns, I’d say that sounds about right.

Bad Use of Incentives

An editorial in the Joplin Globe titled "Good Use of Incentives" praises the proposed Missouri Quality Jobs Act:

Without the additional funding, local leaders say, Missouri can’t run with the big dogs — namely other states that offer more incentives to employers. Meanwhile, folks looking to make a decent wage are looking or moving elsewhere. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, of the 77,760 jobs in the Joplin metropolitan area, more than 50,000 of them paid less than $10 an hour in 2005.

The editorial portrays economic growth as an auction in which states bid for a few companies that pay well. The lucky residents of those states then benefit from higher wages.

The real economy doesn’t work that way. Any company can afford to pay its employees well if they’re productive enough. But first, employees need to invest in their own education and skills, and their employers need to train them.

A tax incentive program requiring companies to pay high wages is at best a temporary fix. The jobs will probably go to the most productive Missouri residents, who already earn high wages. And most businesses that come to Missouri for a special tax break will leave as soon as some other state offers a better deal.

A better idea is a tax cut that treats all businesses equally, which would give existing companies the chance to spend more on job training or to hire new employees. It would also make life a little bit easier for imaginative entrepreneurs who are dreaming of creating some well-paying jobs from scratch.

Broad Coalition Behind the Midwives

There’s a great column in the Post-Dispatch today about the midwife legislation:

Every mother has a particular way in which they want to give birth and their reasons are motivated by their interests and those of their children. Until a week or so ago, Missouri had a knee-jerk rejection of home birthing — it is a felony to practice midwifery without a doctor’s oversight[…]

Opponents say the bill lacks penalties for bad midwives. Why have they not addressed the matter previously? It’s not like they didn’t have the opportunity. Do they think that nothing bad ever happens at a hospital and there is never any negligence, ever? Ever hear of the soaring 30% cesarean rate? Apparently, a medical mistake is only criminal if you aren’t a doctor. There are bad doctors just as there are bad midwives.

And here‘s an interesting article about the legislation’s diverse supporters. It’s remarkable how people with different opinions and lifestyles can join together to lobby for more freedom in health care. This is an advantage of allowing people to make their own decisions: There’s less arguing when people are free to be different.   

School Choice Would Provide Incentives

An editorial in today’s Post-Dispatch says:

Almost half of the 23 school districts in St. Louis County have slammed their doors in the faces of kids who want to transfer out of the beleaguered St. Louis Public Schools after the district loses its accreditation. The rest are undecided.

Sadly, not a single district so far has agreed to take more kids from the city schools. That’s bad news for parents desperately searching for educational options, bad news for kids and bad news for the future of our work force.

We already know that Missouri parents support school choice by huge margins. The Show-Me Institute has been staying on top of this issue with recent op-eds from Steve Bernstetter and Sarah Brodsky.

Continue reading “School Choice Would Provide Incentives”

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging