The Results Are in—We Got a C-

The Center for Education Reform’s (CER) Parent Power! Index was just released and Missouri actually improved from a D on the last index to a solid C-. CER created the index in 1999 to measure whether a state has “policies in place that put students ahead of systems,” “values the diversity of need and condition of every family,” “provides accessible information,” and “puts families in charge.” Despite having several school choice programs, Missouri, it seems, falls short on delivery.

In fact, the researchers at CER determined that our governor has “been quiet on the subject of parent power and educational choice.” They also noted that, while school report cards can be found on DESE’s website, they are “not very user-friendly or easy to navigate.” (So apparently, Institute analysts  are not the only ones making that claim.) We got a C on our charter school law because it’s only limited to students in a couple of communities. We got D’s on digital and personalized learning, choice programs, and teacher quality.

The Parent Power! Index doesn’t seem to mesh well with the Heritage Foundation’s Education Freedom Index, where we did great on everything but Transparency. The key difference between these two measures is that the CER index examines how Missouri families are actually faring in the education landscape. Do policies as implemented empower parents? What are the governor and state legislature actually doing to put students first and give families the information they need? Meanwhile, the Heritage index is grading how we appear on paper. We’ve got charter schools and a private school choice program. Kudos to us. The fact that 95 percent of Missouri families can’t access this school choice program is just an inconvenient truth.

If Missouri were on a dating app for school choice, our profile would look great. But the first date is going to reveal the truth. There’s very little “there” there.

On Lying, Kansas City Says the Quiet Part Out Loud

When I was at Saint Louis University’s School of Law back in 2006, I vividly remember finding out that SLU (a Jesuit school) had been arguing to Missouri courts that it was not, in fact, an institution “controlled by a religious creed” so that it could qualify for tax incentives for a new arena in midtown. The university got its tax incentives, but for many practicing Catholics who had attended SLU, the school’s court argument was both illuminating and disturbing. To the public, SLU portrayed itself as Catholic, period, and I think still does. But to the government, SLU portrayed itself as only in that “tradition”—and thus eligible for Caesar’s coin.

Court filings tend to draw the truth out of circumstances that marketing materials can often conceal and gloss over, and I was reminded of my alma mater’s proof of this years ago when I saw a story today about litigation involving the City of Kansas City, flagged to me by my colleague David Stokes. And boy, is the lesson a doozy:

The city filed a motion in Jackson County Circuit Court last week seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Chris Hernandez, the city’s former communications director. In his suit, Hernandez alleged that he was demoted for refusing to lie to the Star and other local news organizations about city projects and services at the behest of City Manager Brian Platt.

In its motion, the city argues that lying to the press is not a violation of any law, rule or regulation.

“Despite the respected place that the press has as the fourth estate of American politics, there is no law concerning false disclosures to the press,” the city’s motion reads. “Nor is there a rule or regulation set forth by any governmental entity, including the city, that governs false disclosures to the press.”

The specific issue is what Kansas City officials were saying to the press and the public about the extent of road resurfacing being done by the city in 2022. Being more generous, the city’s intended “media strategy” was to knowingly overstate the truth of the work by about one third; being less generous, the city’s plan was to lie to make itself look good.

Whatever the characterization you prefer, the city’s filing should be illuminating for big- and small-government types alike. Whatever your preferred size of government, truth and transparency in government operation is fundamental to justify taking money from the public through force of taxation and allowing elected officials and bureaucrats to spend it on the public’s behalf. Without it, government is just a self-serving cabal stealing money from you under color of law.

Kansas City’s “trust us, you can’t trust us” court filing reaffirms the importance of robust transparency and consequences for misbehavior for state and local governments. Without transparency and accountability, government will run roughshod over you and your rights. But you already knew that.

 

How to Start a Microschool with Don Soifer

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Don Soifer.

Don Soifer is Chief Executive Officer of the National Microschooling Center, America’s comprehensive resource center, movement-builder and authority for the most exciting new education movement in a generation. He co-created and co-directed the Southern Nevada Urban Micro Academy, the nation’s first public–private partnership microschool with the City of North Las Vegas, delivering unprecedented academic growth with a previously underserved population of families under pandemic operating conditions.

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Empowering Parents of Every Background with Krissia Campos Spivey

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Krissia Campos Spivey.

Krissia Campos Spivey is a rising national leader in ensuring equality of educational opportunity for Hispanic families. After raising the bar for parent-facing school choice resources in Spanish as a part of National School Choice Week, she’s expanding on that work as director of the newly launched Conoce tus Opciones Escolares (CTOE). In tandem with National School Choice Week, CTOE helps parents explore all of their K-12 education options, in Spanish, year-round.

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

National School Choice Week with Shelby Doyle

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Shelby Doyle about National School Choice Week 2023.

As vice president of public awareness at National School Choice Week, Shelby serves as the lead strategist for media outreach, digital communications, and as a national spokesperson. In addition, she works with schools, organizations, and individuals across the country to help raise awareness about the tens of thousands of independently-planned events that make up the Week.

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Inflation and the Dangers of False Narratives

With the release of inflation data over the past two weeks—consumer inflation (CPI) late last week and producer inflation (PPI) this week—glimmering signs of hope are emerging that 1970s and ’80s-era inflation may finally be in the rearview mirror. Predictably, this has led to crowing by the Biden administration that its policies deserve the credit, but the reality is quite the opposite. The administration’s glut of spending helped fuel the inflation to begin with, and the Federal Reserve has been cleaning up the mess over the past year after finally abandoning its use of the word “transitory” to refer to what clearly has been a persistent bout of inflation.

Beginning in early 2022, the Fed initiated a rate hike campaign that, to date, has taken the federal funds rate (which influences other interest rates in the economy) from 0% to over 4%. We now have evidence that the Fed’s rate hikes are beginning to bite. Consumer price inflation peaked in the summer of 2022 at over 9% and has been on the decline ever since, most recently hitting 6.5%. This lag between rate hikes and inflation dropping is common. Moreover, because the monthly inflation increases were so high in the first half of 2022 and have been considerably lower over the past few months, the topline year-over-year inflation readings are set to fall rapidly over the next several months—possibly even falling below 4% by early summer. The figure below visualizes a plausible path of inflation over the next few months.

If this projection comes to pass, it would of course be very good news for families’ pocketbooks. Keep in mind, however, that inflation is declining despite the federal government continuing to spend too much money, and not because of any of the recently passed legislation. Absent the spending binge of 2021 and 2022, the United States would almost surely not have seen the decades-high inflation that has robbed families of precious purchasing power—an erosion shown in the figure below. Since the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act in early 2021, consumer prices have risen cumulatively by nearly 14%. During that same period, worker earnings have increased by less than 10%. This four-point gap marks a significant decline in purchasing power that is showing no immediate signs of reversing.

By contrast, if one looks at recent history—namely, the period between early 2017 and the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic—earnings noticeably outpaced inflation, as shown in the figure below. In fact, inflation-adjusted median household income jumped by the most on record during that period, just as poverty rates hit historic lows. It is worth pointing out that economic gains of that size were not expected. Instead, the economy outperformed earlier projections from the Congressional Budget Office made prior to the pro-growth tax reforms passed in 2017 and the concerted effort across federal agencies to streamline and reduce the burden of regulations.

Looking forward, the good news is that inflation is likely to continue falling, and possibly at a faster pace over the next few months. Producer price inflation is also moderating, with the most recent core reading (which strips out volatile components related to food, energy, and trade services) coming in at “just” 4.6% year-over-year. However, it is important that we do not move the goalposts and lower the bar for victory. The objective clearly stated by the Federal Reserve—and to which Americans have become accustomed over the past few decades—is inflation that is 2% or less. For this reason, nobody should expect the Federal Reserve to immediately stop hiking rates—let alone begin to cut them—until inflation falls below the 2% threshold and stays there for a while. The Federal Reserve has signaled this much in its recent communications.

Of course, the timeline for finally taming high inflation could be significantly accelerated with a pro-growth, supply-side agenda that unleashed the productive capacity of the U.S. economy whereby businesses could meet demand without raising prices. If we conceptualize inflation as too much money chasing too few goods, one approach to reducing inflation is to take money out of the economy—exactly what the Fed is doing right now—while the other approach is to ramp up the amount of goods and services the economy produces. In light of divided government, substantial tax and regulatory reform is unlikely, but on the positive side, massive partisan tax hikes and spending bills are unlikely too. Inflation relief is (likely) on the way, but it is important to understand how we got here so we don’t end up making the same mistakes again.

State of the State, School Spending and the STL Earnings Tax

Susan Pendergrass, David Stokes and Elias Tsapelas join Zach Lawhorn to discuss the newly added spending data at MoSchoolRankings.org, takeaways from the State of the State Address and a new court decision on applying the City of St. Louis earnings tax to remote work.

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Now What? The Debt Ceiling Crisis with Brian Riedl

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Brian Riedl about the U.S. hitting the debt ceiling and what happens next.

Brian Riedl is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, focusing on budget, tax, and economic policy. Previously, he worked for six years as chief economist to Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) and as staff director of the Senate Finance Subcommittee on Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Growth. He also served as a director of budget and spending policy for Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign and was the lead architect of the ten-year deficit-reduction plan for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.

Listen on Apple Podcasts 

Listen on Stitcher 

Listen on SoundCloud

Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Missouri’s State of the Bloating State

Earlier this month, I expressed my general optimism that Missouri’s 2023 legislative session would be a good one, focused on transparency and reform. Now after the governor’s State of the State address yesterday, I’m not so sure. The word “transparency” showed up zero times in the governor’s prepared remarks, and the word “reform” showed up twice—once in a heading that had seemingly nothing to do with the section’s content, and once referring to a past jobs program. Such thin gruel is especially shocking, given the governor’s own regrets about the transparency and reform initiatives that didn’t pass last year.

But boy, is there a lot of spending—some of which might be justified, such as expanding Interstate 70—but the emphasis on expanding government made the speech basically indistinguishable from a speech by a tax-and-spend liberal. The governor didn’t propose a single meaningful change to the state’s failing education system or suggest a single reduction in government. Nothing about further tax cuts. Nothing about anything truly aspirational, reform minded, or geared toward good governance at all.

It’s understandable that the governor would want to pursue some form of legacy initiative or project near the end of his final term. Frankly, redoing I-70 should be plenty. But programs that permanently expand the reach of Missouri’s welfare state—like a universal pre-K program that the Heritage Foundation has eviscerated time and again—run completely against the small government view that many politicians in Missouri had historically given lip service to.

Perhaps in future speeches and press availabilities, the governor will expand upon his State of the State remarks, adding back in some of the reform-minded small government conservatism.  The legislature has been advocating for a variety of these small government reforms, and I thought the governor’s office was in agreement. The governor can, and should, do better.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging