This Is The Best Idea I Have Ever Had…

A short time ago, Maurice wrote about how a proposal to dramatically increase the cigarette tax in Illinois might drive Illinois smokers to buy their cancer sticks in Missouri. This article reminded me about how Bill McClellan used to write in the Post about the experiences he would have buying liquor on Sundays in Illinois, before Missouri allowed Sunday sales in the mid-’90s. And then it hit me — we need an area between the two states, sort of a duty-free, local-tax demilitarized zone, where residents can go to experience the best of both states at the same time.

Seriously, join me as I go with this idea for a bit. What are the tax/entertainment benefits of Illinois that Missouri residents cross the river to get? Let’s get the obvious out of the way here: Illinois gives you gambling like they have it in Vegas (no $2 entrance fee, no loss limits, no charge for drinks), strip clubs and horse racing. Next, if you are a Missourian lucky enough to have an office or close friends or family in Illinois, you can register your car there and avoid Missouri’s automobile property tax. Ticket scalping is also legal in Illinois, although that, like Sunday liquor sales, appears to be coming to Missouri. Finally, they have later bar closing hours, although asking a question like that at Pop’s suddenly gets very existential. (How can a bar never close???)

What benefits does Missouri offer Illinois residents? For the most part, it’s the lower taxes on gas and cigarettes that Illinois residents get here. We have a tax of 17 cents per pack and per gallon, both, while in the Land of Lincoln it’s 98 cents per pack and 32.5 per gallon. Missouri also has a lower sales tax in general than Illinois, although if you add in the local St. Louis sales taxes, I think the comparison evens out. Neither state has a bottle deposit law like Michigan, but it’s safe to say Missouri will be the last state in America to pass that, so we’ll count that for us.

So I suggest we declare the middle hundred yards or so of the Eads bridge an area within both states, under control of an appointed, multi-state board like Metro, where the lower taxes and more permissive limits of either state apply. The area would need a gas station, a convenience store, a bar, a state revenue office that could serve both states, and a UPS store for your auto registration, and a Post Office Box. The bar would close late and sell packages-to-go, the gas would be cheap — the smokes, too — and it would all be a short walk to the Casino Queen, if that is how you like to spend your property tax savings. I intend to talk to the governors of both states about this, just as soon as I sober up.

P.S. — I was only joking about having to sober up.

Welcome to Missouri, Illinois Smokers!

According to an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Illinois may be looking to increase its cigarette tax to pay for health care:

State leaders are quietly exploring the possibility of doubling
Illinois’ cigarette tax to almost $2 a pack in an effort to fund Gov.
Rod Blagojevich’s universal health care plan.

Missouri’s cigarette tax would remain at 17 cents, the lowest in the nation. There is really a two-fold lesson here. One, instead of trying to tax an decreasingly popular lifestyle to provide health care for everyone, open health care to the free market. Two, this will lead many Illinois residents to border states like Missouri in the search for cheaper cigarettes. In my view, let them come. The welcome mat is out for Illinois.

Who is Buying What?

An editorial in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch today discusses the findings of one person who is rummaging through the purchases of state officials. Of the billions of dollars of spending, here are a couple of interesting things that they, and I, are wondering why the state purchased:

What did the taxpayers get for the $950 in prizes for the Missouri
Horseshoe Pitchers Association? And what’s the story on the $9 spent
for shoe repair at Albert’s Shoe Repair? Whose shoes were they, and why
was the state picking up the tab?

The editorial also points out how troublesome it is that we can see where the purchases were made, but little else. There are no details of what exactly was bought, or what the exact purpose was. The website is a great step toward accountability, as I explained in an earlier blog entry, but hopefully, as time goes on, the system will provide greater detail about government expenditures.

P.S. The state of Missouri spent $5,615.15 at Imo’s in the last fiscal year. That’s a whole lot of pizza and toasted ravioli.

County Proceeds With Takeover of Conway Road

St. Louis County is proceeding (agenda item # 28) with the takeover of Conway Road in response to Westwood’s insane idea of jamming up alternate traffic routes during I-64 construction for a million other county residents, in order to benefit 284. Westwood village chairman Frederick Berger is quoted in the Post-Dispatch:

"I continue to think the county does not have the right to take over Conway Road," Berger said.

If this was just a politician grandstanding, that would be one thing. But he also serves as the village attorney, and as such is supposed to know the law. And that law, again according to the Post:

"County code and state law authorize the council to designate any road within St. Louis County as part of its arterial road system, regardless of city boundaries or opposition."

So he is completely wrong. End of argument. The article goes on to describe how other cities (Ladue, Frontenac, Creve Couer) objected to earlier county road takeover plans to handle I-64 construction and were able to come to an agreement with the county without a takeover. That is true, but what is left out is that the county got everything it wanted from the munis as part of those discussions. The threat to just take over the road and do whatever the county wants is very real, and there is no realistic municipality counter.

Westwood should drop this selfish idea of putting up gates during construction to screw everyone else. Then, and only then, should the county drop its takeover plans. I live in U. City. During MetroLink construction, we lost the use of the Forest Park Parkway for three years. Everyone has to sacrifice a little during these major construction projects. It is a part of democracy, and also just basic decency.

It’s Time To Upgrade Our Teachers

An article in today’s Southeast Missourian talks about a report that ranks Missouri teacher preparation at the bottom in the United States:

Missouri received low marks — C’s and D’s — in its regulations
dealing with quality, licensing and evaluation of teachers, state
governance of teacher preparation programs, alternate routes to teacher
certification and preparation of special education teachers.

The report criticizes the academic courses that education majors take, the fact that teachers are evaluated every other year rather than every year, and that the route to alternative certification is too burdensome — especially for people who want to transition from other careers to become teachers. There is some room to reform teacher education in Missouri, and it’s time to review how we train teachers here to make sure they have the skills necessary to teach children in the 21st century.

I’ll Miss Rep. Bearden

It was announced yesterday that Rep. Carl Bearden is resigning from the Missouri House. As a person who wants to see the education system improve, it’s a sad day to know that someone who fought for parents and students to have more options will leave the place where he could have made changes. I think this quote sums up his beliefs (courtesy of the Columbia Tribune):

“The educational establishment seems to have this opinion that unless
it’s your idea, or unless it’s blessed by you, no one outside of
education is smart enough to disagree. It almost comes across as, ‘How
dare you, as a non-educator, question or challenge what we think?’ That
attitude is growing very thin in this building.”

Bearden didn’t make many friends in the public school system in Missouri, but it’s difficult to make friends in the establishment when you fight for reform. Good luck in whatever you do, Rep. Bearden.

More Flexible Certification Could Help Ease Teacher Shortages

When schools hire teachers for a new school year, they generally find that some subjects are harder to staff than others. For instance, rural districts might not have enough candidates who are fluent in foreign languages. Another possible shortage area is special education, which calls for patience and dedication beyond what is required in working with other students. And science and math positions are notoriously difficult to fill, because people with degrees in those areas are offered well-paying jobs in business. The list could go on: The U.S. Department of Education has designated these and 13 other fields as teacher shortage areas in Missouri.

Missouri could alleviate the shortage by making it easier for professionals in other fields to become teachers. One reason for the shortage is the teacher certification process. The standard route to certification involves earning a bachelor’s degree in education. This prerequisite would make sense if people chose their careers while in college and did the same work for the following four decades. It’s less reasonable today, when workers learn new skills on the job and often change careers over the course of their lives.

Some people who earn bachelor’s degrees in science or math will decide they want to become teachers. And many education school graduates will decide not to go into teaching after all, or will quit teaching after a short time. Employment data show the severity of the problem. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), only 47.5 percent of people who earned bachelor’s degrees in education in 1992-93 were teaching in 1994, and 35 percent of the 1999-2000 education graduates were not teaching the following year. The NCES also reports that about half of all new teachers have left teaching after five years.

Districts wouldn’t find enough teachers if they had to rely on education school graduates alone. That’s why all 50 states have instituted alternative routes to teaching certification. The alternative routes allow college graduates to work toward full certification by gaining teaching experience, participating in mentoring programs, and completing coursework on teaching methods. These programs are remarkably successful: About one-third of new teachers hired in the U.S. have earned alternative certifications.

Missouri’s alternative route to certification is a good start, but it’s not yet flexible enough to meet the state’s demand for new teachers. Missouri requires candidates to have completed or be enrolled in courses on the “psychology of learning” and other topics, and to finish an additional eight credit hours of education coursework during the following year. Other states allow candidates for certification to complete distance-learning courses while working full-time.

For example, in Florida candidates begin teaching after passing a background check and a test of subject-area knowledge. They receive training in lesson planning and other teaching skills from their school districts before the first day of school. Then, the candidates receive guidance and feedback from experienced teachers as they begin teaching. Candidates complete education coursework through online courses; the amount of time it takes to fulfill this requirement varies from candidate to candidate. This flexibility allows candidates for certification in Florida to gain practical knowledge right away.

Modeling Missouri’s alternative route to teaching certification after Florida’s would help attract more professionals to teaching, and prepare them for successful careers in education. It would also enable districts to hire qualified teachers for math, science, and other hard-to-staff subjects.

Sarah Brodsky is a policy analyst at the Show-Me Institute.

 

Corrected Numbers for Sen. McCaskill

John Hancock at MissouriPulse.com reports that Pork Busters miscalculated in its appropriations ranking of Sen. Claire McCaskill, which Maurice commented on yesterday:

Good news for Sen. Claire McCaskill. The government watchdogs at Pork Busters made an error. In a new report, Pork Busters mistakenly gave McCaskill the third worst Senate earmark index reform score of 16.6. The score was derived from 12 votes considered to be genuine opportunities to support earmark reform. A look at McCaskill’s vote-by-vote analysis finds that she was mistakenly held accountable for five votes cast prior to her election last fall.

This doesn’t improve her score by too much, but we present the correction because we strive for accuracy.

It’s not our goal here to try to make particular politicians look bad —? our goal is to make a case for good policy and good political decisions. That may mean we criticize bad policy at times, but we’re also happy to see good efforts to succeed. And I genuinely hope that McCaskill’s efforts to reform the congressional earmark process are successful. It’s a battle well worth fighting.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging