Letter from the Suburbs

Another letter in the Post-Dispatch from someone in the suburbs who’s worried about city kids going to suburban schools:

Can county districts, for example, agree to take only a certain number of students from kindergarten through fifth grade, and only until they reach middle school? Can they decide they can’t afford to accept any more students with disabilities? How about accepting only high school students whose grade-point average is more than 3.0 and who have no disciplinary issues? Can they decide to take only students who pass an entrance exam or who are at a certain reading level?

I thought the problem with tuition tax credits and vouchers was that they help students attend private schools, and private schools accept only the best students. But the letter suggests that suburban districts should be able to impose admissions requirements comparable to those set by the most selective private schools like John Burroughs and MICDS.

You don’t hear charter schools and Catholic schools complaining that parental choice will send them disabled or academically struggling students. Many charters and private schools consider educating these students to be a privilege.

Getting Drop-Outs Back in School

A new charter school will focus on teaching students who have dropped out or who are at risk of dropping out. The school will be run by Can! Academy:

Can! Academy, which operates public charter high schools throughout the country, offers small class sizes and intensive counseling and job training to its students. According to post-graduation surveys of its students, three-quarters of its graduates go on to college or vocational schools, company officials say.

Superintendent Diana Bourisaw is opposed; she argues that the district is already dealing with the drop-out problem by opening three alternative programs this year.

The Post-Dispatch offers some vacuous commentary:

Can! Academy, Big Picture Company, Alternatives Unlimited and ACE Learning Center all may have something to offer, but the state must be sure to look objectively at their results as well as their methodologies.

and some words of wisdom:

Given the complexity of the dropout problem, it is unlikely that one approach will solve it.

Hear, hear.

A Law is Born

The midwife legislation becomes law:

Gov. Matt Blunt signed legislation Friday that started out expanding health insurance options and ended up, unbeknownst to most lawmakers, legalizing midwifery.

Since the issue has gotten so much attention in the press, it’s hard to believe it’s really unbeknownst to any legislators by now. However, if they don’t want to follow the story in the papers they can always read our blog.

Please Read the Transcript of this Article Back to Me…

There is a very interesting article in the Kansas City Star today about a provision in a bill passed by the legislature to lower the standards to be a court reporter in Missouri. The bill has been passed but not yet signed, so I say that means this is a good time to discuss it. I have some familiarity with court reporters, so I don’t come to this issue completely unarmed. My general feeling about occupation regulation is that it is ludicrously overdone here in Missouri, and many other states. At some point in the future somebody here at SMI, perhaps this author, will probably do a study on it. Anyway, what should we do about this provision?

In my opinion, occupations in the legal field have a stronger argument for regulation than many others.  Everyone agrees that cops should be trained and certified. In theory, all that is supposed to matter in the law is what is right, and the consequences of actions and decisions are far more serious then your haircut. That being said, as I read this article, the bill in question merely allows uncertified court reporters to perfom some actions (depositions, not courtroom work) and both attorneys have to allow the uncertified reporter and agree to the work after review. Seems to me like a pain in the ass rear to do all that, frankly, when you could just hire a certified reporter. Representative Shannon Cooper, who sponsored the legislation, is absolutely right when he says certified court reporters, like every regulated occupation, are just trying to protect their turf and keep out competition. However, that in and of itself does not make them wrong.

Final judgement? This is not a bad idea. If attorneys choose to go the extra mile to use an uncertified reporter that they like, that is fine. However, on the long list of regulated professions, there are many worse examples of unnecessary and burdensome requirements than those for court reporters. Now, please repeat back to me what I wrote in paragraph two.

Virtual School Off to a Slow Start

Missouri’s new virtual school hasn’t taken off as quickly as expected:

Director Curt Fuchs had expected more than 5,000 full- and part-time students to enroll during the three-week registration period, requiring the state to use a lottery system to divvy up the seats. But as of Tuesday’s registration deadline, just 1,701 students had signed up.

As I discuss here, the virtual school would be more popular if it offered greater variety and responded to parents’ requests. Many of the parents who lobbied for online courses have middle-school students. This year, the Virtual Instruction Program won’t offer a single course at that level.

The strictly limited registration period also seems counterproductive, since one of the possible attractions of a virtual school is the flexibility it could afford.

Realism is a Good Thing…

My love of trains has been discussed before. However, in a recently released study recommending against adding an Amtrak line connecting Saint Louis to Springfield (MO), the State Department of Transportation and Amtrak seem to have sided with common-sense and the free-market. Subsidizing a train connecting your two largest cities with the State Capitol is one thing, but adding to that without the market demand would be poor policy and even worse economics. Not to mention the increased subsidy required might jeapordize the one existing route. Much more important is connecting St. Louis to New Orleans without a required bus ride to Carbondale. Maybe the market would support it, maybe not, but this is New Orleans we are talking about here for christsakes… 

A Contract to Reconsider

The St. Louis School Board may reconsider its contract to bash the charter schools:

School Board member David Jackson said Wednesday that he would seek to place the contract on the agenda for the board’s June 12 meeting and will change his vote.

"I don’t want to pay $25,000 to dog another entity," said Jackson, one of four board members who supported the contract. He now prefers the money be spent to promote the city schools rather than denounce charter schools.

And here’s the Board Vice President explaining why he favored the contract:

"This is an emergency," Purdy said. "We had to reach out to the parents making the decisions about where to send their children now. By August it will be too late."

The School Board seems to have gotten the message that parents will go elsewhere if they have the choice. What the district doesn’t realize is that advertising alone won’t keep students in the district. Parents aren’t flocking to charter schools because of a few commercials.   

If the St. Louis Public Schools want to retain students, they should improve their product. Public schools in the suburbs don’t have to advertise; everyone knows which ones are the best from word of mouth.

Blinded by the Blight

George Orwell famously warned about the use of political terminology to obscure meaning, rather than to reveal or enlighten. It’s a problem that continues today, as I was reminded by an article in the Springfield News-Leader:

Commercial Street business owners are working to improve that area’s image — but to get needed tax help, they may have to put up with the label "blighted."

Mike MacPherson, senior planner with the city of Springfield, supports using tax-increment financing — available only to areas officially designated as "blighted" — to pay for changes on Commercial such as more parking and outdoor stages. TIF uses tax revenue collected from new development to fund projects beneficial to the public in those areas.

MacPherson said Commercial Street is blighted under any definition. About half the buildings on the street are vacant. Most are deteriorating.

But the ominous-sounding label does not mean supporters are wrong to say Commercial Street conditions are improving, according to MacPherson.

An area in which things are improving is labeled as blighted. A quick look at any dictionary will reveal definitions for "blight" such as these: "something that frustrates plans or hopes," "something that impairs or destroys," or "a deteriorated condition." If the vacant buildings on Commercial Street were gradually destroying the area, making things continually worse over time, the area could be called blighted. But even if there are negative aspects, an area can’t be called blighted if it’s improving despite them. That’s the opposite of blight.

The article continues:

Lyle Foster, owner of Big Momma’s Coffee and Espresso Bar at 217 E. Commercial, has worked to change negative perceptions about the street.

At a recent news conference, he listed a number of improvements made in the last two years: over $4 million in investment, "green" building initiatives, 25 lofts now under development and 40 lofts completed and occupied.

This is the sort of development that actual blighted areas would never see. The term is also being misapplied right here in Clayton, as David Stokes noted last week.

It’s an abuse of language to look at a healthy, thriving area and call it "blighted" just because it’s not doing quite as well as you think it could under different ownership. Using that terminology to obscure truth and then take people’s property through eminent domain provisions is an abuse of justice.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging