Missouri Revolutionizes Health Insurance

We’re constantly reminded by the media that health care is in a crisis in the United States. Too few people with policies, too few conditions covered, an uncertain economy in which a lack of job permanency leaves people stranded without options when they get sick. You’d think reporters would jump all over a story about a new law that proposes to help alleviate many of these problems. At least our own Beverly Gossage has the pertinent info:

A long-awaited free-market step on the path to cover those without health insurance came out of Jefferson City on Friday. Gov. Matt Blunt signed HB 818, making Missouri the first state to permit pretax contributions from small business owners to their employees’ individually selected policies. Unlike other health care reform “solutions” that require more government intervention and bureaucracy?third-party or one-payer systems, employer mandates, tax hikes, and cost shifting?this law offers a common sense approach to health care reform.

The media has focused on a controversial midwife provision that was inserted into the bill at the last minute. But the real news here is the bill’s revolutionary approach to health insurance reform — and the fact that the bill won such overwhelming bipartisan support in both chambers of the Legislature. There’s a lot to be excited about in HB 818, so here’s a primer you won’t find in the press.

Every newspaper article I’ve seen about Friday’s HB 818 signing frames it in terms of the midwife provision. It’s easy to focus on that because the fact that Sen. John Loudon managed to sneak the measure into the larger bill without anybody noticing is simply interesting. It’s a juicy story of political controversy and legislative dysfunction that illustrates several public choice insights. And besides, legalizing the practice of midwifery is also a great idea, as Sarah Brodsky has reminded us in this blog. At heart, it’s as much an issue of economic freedom and consumer choice as any other occupational licensure restriction.

But HB 818 is exciting for many other reasons. The health care crisis of today is largely a government-created problem, stemming from state licensure and financing of the medical profession, and from World War II-era wage freezes and price controls that gave employers an incentive to provide health insurance benefits instead of paying higher wages. This ultimately led to employer-based benefits becoming cemented as the norm for insurance coverage in the United States, a system that leaves out a tremendous number of people.

When government officials see problems they themselves created, their usual response is ever-spiraling regulation. More top-down control. Instead, the insurance bill signed into law on Friday takes a significant step in the right direction — allowing more individual choice and decentralized control.

Read more in Beverly Gossage’s primer on HB 818 and her Friday op-ed about why it’s so important.

Letter from the Suburbs

Another letter in the Post-Dispatch from someone in the suburbs who’s worried about city kids going to suburban schools:

Can county districts, for example, agree to take only a certain number of students from kindergarten through fifth grade, and only until they reach middle school? Can they decide they can’t afford to accept any more students with disabilities? How about accepting only high school students whose grade-point average is more than 3.0 and who have no disciplinary issues? Can they decide to take only students who pass an entrance exam or who are at a certain reading level?

I thought the problem with tuition tax credits and vouchers was that they help students attend private schools, and private schools accept only the best students. But the letter suggests that suburban districts should be able to impose admissions requirements comparable to those set by the most selective private schools like John Burroughs and MICDS.

You don’t hear charter schools and Catholic schools complaining that parental choice will send them disabled or academically struggling students. Many charters and private schools consider educating these students to be a privilege.

Getting Drop-Outs Back in School

A new charter school will focus on teaching students who have dropped out or who are at risk of dropping out. The school will be run by Can! Academy:

Can! Academy, which operates public charter high schools throughout the country, offers small class sizes and intensive counseling and job training to its students. According to post-graduation surveys of its students, three-quarters of its graduates go on to college or vocational schools, company officials say.

Superintendent Diana Bourisaw is opposed; she argues that the district is already dealing with the drop-out problem by opening three alternative programs this year.

The Post-Dispatch offers some vacuous commentary:

Can! Academy, Big Picture Company, Alternatives Unlimited and ACE Learning Center all may have something to offer, but the state must be sure to look objectively at their results as well as their methodologies.

and some words of wisdom:

Given the complexity of the dropout problem, it is unlikely that one approach will solve it.

Hear, hear.

A Law is Born

The midwife legislation becomes law:

Gov. Matt Blunt signed legislation Friday that started out expanding health insurance options and ended up, unbeknownst to most lawmakers, legalizing midwifery.

Since the issue has gotten so much attention in the press, it’s hard to believe it’s really unbeknownst to any legislators by now. However, if they don’t want to follow the story in the papers they can always read our blog.

Please Read the Transcript of this Article Back to Me…

There is a very interesting article in the Kansas City Star today about a provision in a bill passed by the legislature to lower the standards to be a court reporter in Missouri. The bill has been passed but not yet signed, so I say that means this is a good time to discuss it. I have some familiarity with court reporters, so I don’t come to this issue completely unarmed. My general feeling about occupation regulation is that it is ludicrously overdone here in Missouri, and many other states. At some point in the future somebody here at SMI, perhaps this author, will probably do a study on it. Anyway, what should we do about this provision?

In my opinion, occupations in the legal field have a stronger argument for regulation than many others.  Everyone agrees that cops should be trained and certified. In theory, all that is supposed to matter in the law is what is right, and the consequences of actions and decisions are far more serious then your haircut. That being said, as I read this article, the bill in question merely allows uncertified court reporters to perfom some actions (depositions, not courtroom work) and both attorneys have to allow the uncertified reporter and agree to the work after review. Seems to me like a pain in the ass rear to do all that, frankly, when you could just hire a certified reporter. Representative Shannon Cooper, who sponsored the legislation, is absolutely right when he says certified court reporters, like every regulated occupation, are just trying to protect their turf and keep out competition. However, that in and of itself does not make them wrong.

Final judgement? This is not a bad idea. If attorneys choose to go the extra mile to use an uncertified reporter that they like, that is fine. However, on the long list of regulated professions, there are many worse examples of unnecessary and burdensome requirements than those for court reporters. Now, please repeat back to me what I wrote in paragraph two.

Virtual School Off to a Slow Start

Missouri’s new virtual school hasn’t taken off as quickly as expected:

Director Curt Fuchs had expected more than 5,000 full- and part-time students to enroll during the three-week registration period, requiring the state to use a lottery system to divvy up the seats. But as of Tuesday’s registration deadline, just 1,701 students had signed up.

As I discuss here, the virtual school would be more popular if it offered greater variety and responded to parents’ requests. Many of the parents who lobbied for online courses have middle-school students. This year, the Virtual Instruction Program won’t offer a single course at that level.

The strictly limited registration period also seems counterproductive, since one of the possible attractions of a virtual school is the flexibility it could afford.

Realism is a Good Thing…

My love of trains has been discussed before. However, in a recently released study recommending against adding an Amtrak line connecting Saint Louis to Springfield (MO), the State Department of Transportation and Amtrak seem to have sided with common-sense and the free-market. Subsidizing a train connecting your two largest cities with the State Capitol is one thing, but adding to that without the market demand would be poor policy and even worse economics. Not to mention the increased subsidy required might jeapordize the one existing route. Much more important is connecting St. Louis to New Orleans without a required bus ride to Carbondale. Maybe the market would support it, maybe not, but this is New Orleans we are talking about here for christsakes… 

A Contract to Reconsider

The St. Louis School Board may reconsider its contract to bash the charter schools:

School Board member David Jackson said Wednesday that he would seek to place the contract on the agenda for the board’s June 12 meeting and will change his vote.

"I don’t want to pay $25,000 to dog another entity," said Jackson, one of four board members who supported the contract. He now prefers the money be spent to promote the city schools rather than denounce charter schools.

And here’s the Board Vice President explaining why he favored the contract:

"This is an emergency," Purdy said. "We had to reach out to the parents making the decisions about where to send their children now. By August it will be too late."

The School Board seems to have gotten the message that parents will go elsewhere if they have the choice. What the district doesn’t realize is that advertising alone won’t keep students in the district. Parents aren’t flocking to charter schools because of a few commercials.   

If the St. Louis Public Schools want to retain students, they should improve their product. Public schools in the suburbs don’t have to advertise; everyone knows which ones are the best from word of mouth.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging