Page 876 – Show-Me Institute

Mailing It In

Posted on March 10, 2008May 5, 2026 by Nicholas Loyal

The controversy over seating Democratic delegates awarded in the Florida and Michigan primaries has escalated to the point where it seems that pundits are throwing out ideas at random, only to have them be shot down a few moments later. I usually try to avoid these discussions because of the vacuum of common sense that usually emerges from them, but one idea recently caught my attention.

According to CNN, both Florida and Michigan have considered mail-in ballots as a method for tabulating votes if their respective primaries are to be redone. This method of vote tabulation — already used in Oregon for all elections and as the primary mechanism for absentee voting in most other states — has a number of benefits that are specifically tailored to the current democratic situation. An all-mail primary would cost considerably less than a traditional one, and as recognized by Democratic National Committee Chair Howard Dean, such an exercise would ease the balloting process for all:

"Every voter gets a ballot in the mail. It’s comprehensive. You get to
vote if you’re in Iraq or in a nursing home," he said on CBS’ "Face the
Nation."

Additionally, a mail-in primary could lead to more attention for the process within Missouri. In February, state Representative Jake Zimmerman introduced House Bill 2088, which would establish an all-mail election system for all elections that take place within the state. Currently, the bill has not been referred to a committee, and as reported by Suburban Journals, there is little confidence of it being given serious consideration. However, as the resident intern in favor of election reform, I’m hoping that any attention given to mail-in balloting by Florida and Michigan leads Missouri lawmakers to reconsider it as an electoral method.

Is Math Like a Missile Shield?

Posted on March 10, 2008May 5, 2026 by Sarah Brodsky

Lee Stiff thinks so; he compared the two when he spoke about mathematics curricula in Columbia:

He said letting local districts set curricula was like having personal defense strategies. Some things are better left to the federal government.

Stiff’s metaphor continued: If you don’t like SCUD missiles, it doesn’t mean you should try to shoot down a plane with a rifle "just because that rifle worked for my grandaddy."

Here are a few ways in which math curricula differ from missile shields:

1. There’s general agreement about missile shields, not about math curricula. People might argue about military priorities and the amount of money we should spend on defense, but everyone agrees that we should protect the country. If a missile shield does that, it’s generally considered to be successful. On the other hand, there’s a lot of contention about how to teach even the most basic math concepts. People disagree about what a good math curriculum should accomplish. If the math wars had to be settled at the national level, we’d see the situation in Columbia on a much bigger scale.

2. Missile shields are expensive; math curricula are cheap. All the taxpayers in the United States together pay for a missile shield, but each school district buys its own math curricula. There’s no reason a district can’t buy a few different curricula, as Columbia does for some grades right now. Because it’s easy to buy math curricula at the local level, purchasing decisions should be made at the local level.

3. The benefits of a missile shield are dispersed; the benefits of a math curriculum are concentrated. A missile shield protects many people, all across the country. A math curriculum helps (or hurts) the particular children in a district who learn it. Although we all benefit when other people are well-educated, those benefits are not spread out evenly across the country. If a city adopts an excellent math curriculum, that city benefits from it more than any other place does. And most of the gains go directly to the students themselves.

Math curricula are not the same as missile shields. We shouldn’t institute a national math curriculum based on that false analogy.

Editorial in Springfield News-Leader About Our Transportation Paper

Posted on March 7, 2008May 5, 2026 by David Stokes

I highly recommend this editorial in the Springfield News-Leader about public-private partnerships and toll roads — ideas we discussed with the newspaper’s editorial board last week. It is an excellent editorial, and we thank Tony Messenger for the opportunity to meet with him and his colleagues. Once again, here is the link to our study on the subject. And thanks to Combest for catching the piece and linking to it!

Channel 5 Profiles My Fifth-Grade Teacher

Posted on March 7, 2008May 5, 2026 by David Stokes

KSDK NewsChannel 5 in St. Louis had a profile last night about educators making a difference in children’s lives. They chose to highlight Sister Gail Trippett of Central Catholic St. Nicholas School, whom I remember fondly as my fifth-grade teacher at Immaculate in Richmond Heights. She was a young nun at the time, and she was a great teacher. It is great to see KSDK highlighting the incredible work that Catholic schools do in Missouri.

My primary educational memory of fifth grade was the Modern Woodmen of America speech competition, where every student in grades 5?8 competed in the same oratory contest. I came in second in the entire school, as a fifth grader, which my mother was very proud of. The next year, as a sixth grader, I came in second again, once again losing to an eighth grader. Then they cancelled the competition, just as I was about to begin a dynasty. But I’m not bitter.

The Latest Argument Against Charter Schools

Posted on March 7, 2008May 5, 2026 by Sarah Brodsky

Some people think single-sex charter schools are un-American (thanks to Edspresso for the link):

* The American Civil Liberties Union and National Organization for Women say [single-sex classrooms] would diminish the effects of Title IX, which calls for federally funded educational institutions to treat males and females equally in schools and in sports.

* When you segregate classes, students learn less about tolerance and what it means to be American.

I understand that meeting kids of different cultures and ethnic backgrounds at school could prepare kids for being good citizens. But do we need schools to introduce the sexes to each other in preparation for citizenship? Most kids have siblings, cousins, or neighbors of the opposite sex. They can meet others through extracurricular activities or family friends. The academic and social value of single-sex education is debatable. However, there’s no direct relationship between coed classrooms and democracy.

On second thought, maybe there is. I’m a better citizen when I’m surrounded by cute guys.

Just Desserts

Posted on March 6, 2008May 5, 2026 by Sarah Brodsky

Legislators are starting to lose their cool about ice cream cones — official state ice cream cones, that is:

Farmington Senator Kevin Engler is fed up with teachers thinking it’s a good teaching idea to come up with new state symbols and have their students convince lawmakers to pass a bill for them. "These things are stupid," he has told the Senate.

He argues the legislature is not a teaching tool for fourth graders…and that it demeans itself by creating new state symbols when it should be addressing […] things of importance.

There are many other hands-on ways students can learn about state government, like researching ideas for legislation and holding mock debates in their classrooms. Nobody wants to prevent students from having fun with their first civics lessons. But if every class has to get their symbol considered, or even if only a few of children’s bills go to the General Assembly each year, the precedent puts too much pressure on kids to lobby for their bills and try to get them passed. Inevitably, kids will be disappointed when symbols are turned down or when their ideas don’t make it to the floor in the first place. Fourth-grade civics class should be a pleasant fourth-grade experience, not a win-or-lose situation.

Most importantly, as the article points out, flooding the Legislature with state symbols wastes valuable debate time and distracts legislators from the serious issues that Missourians need them to address. That was just a hypothetical concern when there were only a handful of symbols; now, legislators themselves are complaining about the annoyance. Let’s respect them and find other ways to teach kids.

We already have 24 state symbols. Enough is enough.

The Stupidity of Springing Forward

Posted on March 6, 2008May 5, 2026 by Nicholas Loyal

On Sunday, I will get to sleep for one hour less than I otherwise would have, through the wonders that come with the beginning of daylight saving time. Had I been flummoxed by a pitch-dark commute, frozen at a sporting event, or not had enough sun left over to harvest my crops, this event might’ve been a boon for me. However, with the rise of such wonderful technologies as central heating, the incandescent light bulb, and the John Deere 600 Rigid, I think it’s time that we step back and look at whether or not we need to keep pretending it’s an hour earlier than it truly is.

In the state of Indiana, where the economy is primarily based on agricultural pursuits (much like in Missouri), daylight saving time only came into existence in April 2005. Prior to that date, rural counties generally chose to rebuke the practice of changing clocks, while the more urban regions surrounding Chicago, Louisville, and Cincinnati chose to adopt the practice. The reason? Daylight saving isn’t that great for agricultural communities.

Despite the fact that a large majority of the public seems to think that daylight saving time exists "to help farmers," shifting clocks back an hour actually has the opposite effect. Farmers do most of their work in the morning, to avoid as much direct, burning sunlight in the middle of the day as possible. If nothing else, the practice hurts them more than the rest of the population. In actuality, daylight saving time was adopted in order to help cut energy costs by reducing electricity use in the evening hours. But again, with the rise of modern technology, this isn’t the case either.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that, as a result of Indiana’s switch to the system, researchers at the University of California?Santa Barbara were able to determine that an additional $8.6 million was spent on electricity in those Indiana counties which switched over to daylight saving time. The reason? Air conditioning costs. People are home when the sun is still out during the summer, and they crank up the AC to stay cool — whereas before, they would just enjoy the sunset.

The federal government passed a law in 2005 that standardized the start and end times for daylight saving time, but as seen by Indiana’s recent shift, said law is not a mandate for state observance. Missouri, a state that depends on agriculture, is desperately trying (like every other state) to keep energy costs down. Why not end daylight saving time? While I’m not advocating some ridiculous Indiana-like system that would keep St. Louis and Kansas City on daylight time while letting the rural counties ignore it, I think that avoiding the issue entirely is something worth a bit of thought. Sunlight is something our bodies are naturally attuned to. Shouldn’t we listen to it when we make our schedules?

Or maybe I’m just angry about losing that hour of sleep.

St. Patrick’s Day Celebrates Protectionism in Dogtown

Posted on March 5, 2008May 5, 2026 by David Stokes

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch is reporting that the organizers of the annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade in Dogtown (one of two parades in St. Louis for St. Paddy’s Day) are prohibiting people from bringing in their own alcohol this year. The Ancient Order of Hibernians, which hosts the parade each year and always holds it on March 17, has decided to take this step for various reasons, according to the article, including cutting down on underage drinking, reducing trash and broken bottles, and making the event more of a "good, family parade." If you believe any of this, I have some Irish snakes to sell you.

You can still drink at the parade — now you just have to buy the drinks from the vendors in Dogtown (a historically Irish neighborhood in St. Louis). From the article:

Dogtown bars will be open throughout the parade and the street party that follows it, and vendors will continue to sell alcohol outdoors.

Does anyone believe this is being done for any reason other than the profits of Dogtown bars? I would respect the policy more if they just admitted this up front.

I recognize that alchohol is one thing that most people would agree deserves some level of government control, such as closing hours for bars, age restrictions, etc. So I realize that the parade organizers have the right to do this, as one does not normally have the right to drink alchohol on the street, no matter where it was purchased. I am just using my little corner of the blogosphere to call out the parade organizers by pointing out why they are really making this move. And I look forward to buying an $8 beer on the 17th.

Tolling a Valuable Option for Missouri’s Transportation System

Posted on March 5, 2008May 5, 2026 by David Stokes

What is the only tolled transportation facility in Missouri? You don’t have to Google it, I’ll give you the answer: It’s the Lake of the Ozarks Community Bridge, built in 1998. The area had long needed a bridge connecting U.S. Business Route 54 with Shawnee Bend, but after years had passed without funding, officials determined that the only way the bridge would get the necessary financing was to build it as a tolled facility. Legislators passed the Missouri Transportation Corporation Act of 1990 with this proposed bridge in mind, allowing non-profit, quasi-governmental corporations to construct and operate tolled facilities in Missouri. So far, the Lake of the Ozarks Bridge is the only one. If you have ever used it, cutting 30 minutes off your drive around the lake, you probably found the toll to be money wellspent.

Here in Saint Louis, one intriguing fact to emerge from the difficult negotiations about the proposed new Mississippi River Bridge was that a toll bridge was at least given serious consideration. Although independent consultants determined that a tolled facility was not likely to work for this particular project, and the idea of a toll bridge was dropped — partly spurred by opposition from Illinois — the point is that there are innovative ways to finance transportation projects outside of using gas taxes and bonds. For some large projects, the use of a toll may be a more effective way to finance much-needed facilities.

Public roads are a public good, and gas taxes are a relatively fair and reasonable way to pay for them. However, tolling should be given strong consideration for certain projects, such as ones that are urgently needed before traditional funding can be secured, or projects that principally benefit a specific class of people — such as commuters or tourists. Tolling allows a quicker turnaround for some types of projects, and ensures that the people who actually use a new facility will be the ones to help pay for it.

Many Missourians may object to tolls because of their experiences waiting in long lines at old-fashioned toll collection plazas, but the old ways of building toll roads are obsolete. It no longer requires a new government agency, or hundreds of patronage jobs for manual toll collection. New highways in California, Virginia, and locations throughout the world are being built by private companies that contract with the government, leasing the rights to operate a toll road. These new roads make extensive use of EZ Pass technology and license plate–based billing to collect tolls in a safe and efficient manner.

These “public-private partnerships” often require the selected private company to pay an up-front amount to the state, after which that company builds and operates a new highway or bridge, and collects a toll to recoup its investment. The levels of service that the government will demand from a private partner are laid out in extremely detailed contracts, running hundreds of pages. I only wish this possibility had been considered for the Page Avenue Extension connecting Saint Louis and Saint Charles counties, completed in 2003. It could certainly have been built by a private company and funded by toll payments from commuters, who are the extension’s primary users.

Back in 2000 and 2001, MoDOT officials debated how to improve I-70 across Missouri. The agency considered a new parallel toll road to the north of the current highway, but for a variety of reasons, officials settled on expanding the current highway as their preferred alternative. It is now 2008, though, and that project has not yet begun — nor is it anywhere close to beginning. Would tolls have provided the people of Missouri with a new cross-state highway option by now? There is no way to know, but the question is worth asking.

I write this not to fault MoDOT officials for the choice they made in 2001, but to encourage Missourians to consider public-private partnerships and tolled roads or bridges as important new options in addressing the state’s serious, long-term transportation and mobility needs. The future of Missouri’s economy depends of the efficient movement of goods and services. Toll roads are one way to make certain we all move forward, rather than idling in traffic.

David C. Stokes is a policy analyst at the Show-Me Institute, a Missouri-based think tank.

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.