Pop Quiz

Some people are interpreting this reported gain in U.S. student math scores as a victory for central planning. The U.S. has improved on an international math test since implementation of No Child Left Behind; therefore, the thinking goes, we need more federal oversight and national standards.

I have two questions about that reasoning:

  1. If central planning improves math performance, why does it have no effect on science?
  2. If the U.S. does better in a subject as a response to competition from other countries, doesn’t that say more in favor of competition than planning? Maybe we should have a contest between states, instead of more federal directives.

You may use a calculator.

A Law Requiring All Ducks to Wear Long Pants

The Kansas City Star is reporting about a unique law in Missouri — a ban on all yellow margarine. Now, it was only recently that I discovered the difference between butter and margarine, and I couldn’t believe that anyone might actually try to ban margarine in Missouri. Now, imagine my shock in learning that such a law has been on the books since the 19th century.

Luckily, this law has never been enforced. Even so, a Kansas City lawmaker is trying to have the law repealed, giving Missourians the smooth yellowy freedom they deserve. And yet, I ponder, who really cares? I mean, the law hasn’t been enforced and yet this lawmaker is taking the time to have it repealed. Is the inert I-Can’t-Believe-It’s-Not-Butter ban causing so much damage as to warrant such attention? Are there not more urgent issues to deal with? So, which is worse: having a useless uniformed law on the books, or having an elected official waste time and money to repeal it?

This seems like the kind of thing they deal with down in Springfield.

She Blinded Ethanol With Science

Frequent visitors to this blog know that I have a thing or two to say about renewable energy, specifically ethanol. I don’t care for ethanol, even if my friend Willie Nelson loves. It drives up the costs of gasoline and food and makes our cars less efficient. It attracts large government subsidies, and those new corn commercials are starting to get very annoying.

I figured it was only a matter of time until some sort of scientist would muster proof that ethanol = bad. Finally, the Royal Society of Chemistry’s Energy & Environmental Science journal has published a study ranking alternative energy sources in terms of their relative abilities to address problems with “global warming, air pollution mortality, and energy security,” and “other impacts of the proposed solutions, such as on water supply, land use, wildlife, resource availability, thermal pollution, water chemical pollution, nuclear proliferation, and undernutrition.”

Surprise, surprise — ethanol finished dead last.

Hopefully, these findings will not fall on deaf ears. And, if you haven’t read it by now, here is the Show-Me Institute’s ethanol study. Still looking for more ethanol fun? Why not try searching for “ethanol” on Policy Pulse and seeing what pops up?

Oh, and if you didn’t already know, today’s blog title comes from Thomas Dolby’s classic ’80s hit “She Blinded Me With Science.”

Assessment Declines May Not Lead to Tax Cuts (In Case You Thought They Might)

The Post-Dispatch has a front-page story today with tremendous statewide applications. It corrects assumptions about next year’s reassessment process that many people, according to the story, might have. First, the Saint Louis–area assessors that were interviewed don’t seem to think the assessment declines will be that substantial, but the article’s second point makes this moot — taxing districts are protected (a poor choice of words, I admit) from revenue decreases that result from lower property assessments. Any taxing district can increase its rates to make up the difference.

The part about assessments declining only 3 percent, according to most of the assessors the Post spoke with, is probably going to frustrate and upset many people, but in the end it does not mean much. What difference does it make if your assessment declines by 3 percent or 15 percent (on average for a community) if taxing districts increase rates by the same amount, to make up the difference? The answer is that it will make no difference, and your best hope in the assessment lottery is to see your property value decrease more than average. In that case you may actually see a lower tax rate.

I have written many times about how the Saint Louis County assessor actually does a good job on aggregate, but with so many parcels, there is almost no way to avoid the element of chance that comes with the process when you look at one individual home’s assessment. It is that element of chance that infuriates so many people. My own thoughts about how to change the system include eliminating the individual assessment and averaging everything. There are other reasons that people so viscerally dislike the property tax when compared to others taxes, the two main reasons are the fact that the process feels like a lottery, and the fact that this tax is the only one for which most people sit down and write a check to the government.

In conclusion — and to you young bloggers out there, it is poor form to end blog posts with “in conclusion” — the most that average Missourians should expect from reassessment next year is that their property taxes probably will not rise. After the increases that many have seen during the past decade, a leveling-off for a couple of years might not be so bad.

Supply and Demand … What a Novel Idea!

According to Sports Illustrated:

Next season, San Francisco Giants fans buying single-game tickets for an April game against Milwaukee might pay half as much as they would for a weekend game with the rival Los Angeles Dodgers later in the year.

The club is trying something new with ticket sales in a few tough-to-sell upper-deck outfield sections of its waterfront ballpark for 2009: cost based on demand.

The walk-up sales price for up to about 2,000 seats could even go up or down on game day.

Granted, this is only an experiment in San Francisco, but what if the St. Louis Cardinals decided to do this as well? I would love for you to comment.

Merry Christmas, Attorneys!

In a new report, The American Tort Reform Foundation has placed St. Louis and St. Louis County on the “legal hellhole watch list.” I think Philip Corboy Jr., the head of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, stated it best: “The report is just a Christmas gift for the insurance industry and the big business lobby.”

Although we are only on the watch list, this report still indicates that we have a lot of work to do in Missouri to achieve meaningful tort and lawsuit reform. It would be a nightmare if our region went back to the days when Madison County was unanimously ranked #1 on the list. If things get any worse, we might have to refer to my colleague’s previous blog post.

Chiefs Miss the Extra Point …

Right now, I am a little disappointed in the Kansas City Chiefs. Not because of their 2-12 record, or for them being at the bottom of the AFC West. After receiving $50 million in tax credits from the state two years ago to assist with stadium renovations, the Chiefs had the nerve to ask for another $25 million.

According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, “The professional football team’s owners are seeking the new subsidy to upgrade Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City and finance an indoor training arena in St. Joseph.”

Given the financial climate of our state, money is tight. Plus, our governor-elect is already having trouble in his search for money to fund future projects. While the working poor and retirees can barely afford tickets to go to a game, we are asking them to pay the tab for building new restaurants and luxury suites in the stadium. I think this is terrible. It’s also economically unjustified. Despite the development arguments of those who support government funding for stadiums, the theory and practical research both demonstrate that this type of appropriation is a net loss to society:

Households face budget constraints; they must meet their unlimited wants with a limited amount of income. The arrival of a professional sports team in a city provides households with a new entertainment option. Households that choose to attend games will spend less on other things, perhaps going out to dinner, bowling, or the movies. If the impact of each dollar spent on these forgone alternatives has a larger effect on the local economy than the impact of each dollar spent on professional sporting events, the local economy will contract and income will be lower. Why would the impact of each dollar spent going to a professional basketball game be smaller than the impact of each dollar spent on bowling?

But this is what happens when government throws out tax credits like rice in a wedding.

Come on, Chiefs — time to draw up another play. If you were at least .500, maybe we could talk.

David Stokes Talks Occupational Licensing in Joplin Tomorrow Morning

I am going to be appearing with Mark Kinsley on the KZRG 1310 AM morning show on Tuesday (that’s tomorrow) morning at 7:10 a.m. Mark has graciously agreed to put little ‘ol me on for the whole hour, to discuss my recent case study of occupational licensing. You can listen in online from the link above. Because the station broadcasts to both states included in the study, I think this is a great opportunity to talk about the points I make.

I appeared on the morning show with Mark and Kara once before, in February, to talk about tolls and transportation. I am delighted to be appearing again. I encourage you to listen in. They have a great show and we are honored to be a part of it.

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging