So, Does This Mean Taxpayers Will Own Half of Stifel Nicolaus’ New Building?

For Saint Louisans, it’s a Good News/Bad News/Worse News sort of situation. The Good News? One of the region’s big employers, Stifel Nicolaus, is expanding its operations downtown and buying its building. So far, the situation sounds very good indeed. The Bad News? It means that Stifel won’t be moving into Ballpark Village, a development headache that’s plagued the downtown area for years.

The Worse News? It looks like taxpayers could end up paying almost as much for Stifel’s new business plan as Stifel is.

In this case, according to the application, Stifel is seeking $2.8 million in Build Missouri Bonds, a state program designed to defray the cost of expansions. That request will go before the Missouri Development Finance Board next week.

The company also plans to apply for $2.6 million in Missouri Quality Jobs tax credits, which reimburse companies that create jobs paying above-average wages.

Stifel predicts the average new employee will earn $65,000 a year.

From the city of St. Louis, it plans to request a $15 million allocation of federal New Markets Tax Credits, which translates into $3 million in equity for the project. Stifel also will seek property and earnings tax breaks worth $5 million over 10 years, and up to $500,000 a year in breaks on other local taxes — though Stifel agreed to make payments to St. Louis Public Schools.

Much of that aid, including all the state incentives, are dependent on Stifel actually creating the jobs it is promising. All of it, after expenses are counted for, will amount to $17.1 million in public financing for the $35 million project. The rest will come out of Stifel’s pocket.  (Emphasis mine).

“The rest will come out of Stifel’s pocket.” Thankfully.

The Post-Dispatch’s Bill McClellan highlights the contradiction at play here.

Of all the businesses that ought to understand the business of business, it’s Stifel. It’s a brokerage and investment banking firm. The people who run Stifel profess a belief in capitalism.

Except, of course, when it comes to their own affairs. Risk and reward? Nonsense! No investment without incentives.

Well, fine. I can understand the sentiment. If you can get public money, why not get it? What I can’t understand is the way the public always goes along with this stuff.

Just two days ago, David wrote a blog post about how some young entrepreneurs are looking for government assistance to get their businesses off the ground. Unfortunately, it seems they learned the wrong lessons from their predecessors.

Young Entrepreneurs Demand Government Assistance

This is a depressing sign of the new reality. A group of young entrepreneurs is requesting government assistance. This new organization, which consists of young people who are probably pretty awesome in many ways, is looking to the federal government for assistance:

The Young Entrepreneur Council is proposing a Youth Entrepreneurship Act that would address the barriers that he [Scott Gerber, founder of the YEC] says young entrepreneurs face. One element would be a program to forgive student loans and debt for young entrepreneurs, which he says would address a major hindrance to recent graduates who want to set up their own shop.

“Now more than ever, with young unemployment being so high, we have to be educating people that youth entrepreneurship is a viable career path and not some renegade choice,” Gerber said.

You know what would really be a renegade choice? Not requesting special legislation from the government.

In the interest of full disclosure, I used to work for the government and when I had a small business in the 1990s it had a few government agencies as clients. I make no claim to moral purity here, but just wanted to note how depressing it is that a group of young innovators and risk-takers (of all people) would adopt the nasty habit of seeking government handouts as their standard practice of doing business.

Maybe They Should Try Drive-By Assessments in Jackson County

Last week, the Kansas City Star ran an excellent story on radically higher property assessments in Kansas City. The key point is Jackson County went decades without properly assessing these people’s homes. Yes, the property owners benefited from lower assessments over that time, but now they are paying the price with dramatic increases in assessed valuations. While I understand the need to update assessed values, I hope someone in the Jackson County assessor’s office has been held responsible for letting these neighborhoods go so long without proper assessments.

In Saint Louis County, the assessor physically inspects every property over a six-year cycle. I was amazed to read that Jackson County let certain neighborhoods go so long without physical inspections. From the article:

[Jackson County Assessor Curtis] Koons, who came to Jackson County from Cass County in September 2007, said the last inspection of county residential properties was at least 14 years ago, and the last thorough physical inspection, where every house was measured, dated back at least 25 years.

I thought Jackson County was in violation of state law, but apparently it is not. Saint Louis County cites state law in support of its six-year inspection cycle, but apparently that law applies only to Saint Louis County. More precisely, it appears the six-year rule is part of the county’s assessment maintenance plan as approved by the state tax commission (I have requested a clarification, and will update this post with a comment when I receive an answer).

State law or not, allowing so many properties to go so long without an exterior physical inspection is crazy. You can accomplish a lot with a physical inspection just by viewing the home from the sidewalk and offering an interior inspection if the homeowner wants one — which they almost never do.

Jackson County’s plan to update its assessed values will eventually work out. By that I mean that in a few years when the entire county’s assessment schedule has been updated, tax rates can be equalized (i.e., lowered) to adjust for the higher assessments. But for now, the homeowners in this first round will see much higher assessments without corresponding decreases in rates, and the tax bills they receive in October will be killers.

Title reference here.

Aerotropolis: China Hub Responsive Documents, Part 1

 

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging