New Los Angeles Charter School Plan Stuns

Posted on by Brittany Wagner

What do you do when you’re fed up with your city’s public school system?

Most people might attend a school board meeting, but if you’re Eli and Edyth Broad and you’re fed up with the Los Angeles Unified School District, you would come up with a $490 million dollar plan to double the number of charter schools, challenge employee unions and charter school critics, and create 130,000 new quality seats by 2023.

The Broad Foundation plans to open 260 new charter schools over a 7-year period. A 44-page memo describing their plan outlines the growing demand for high-performing charters, describes teacher and school leader recruitment strategies, and calls for more charitable support for the new charters. L.A. Unified already has a large number of charter schools (they educate about 16% of the district’s total enrollment), but if everything goes as planned charter schools will reach 50 percent market share.

The LA Times reported:

Charters have proved popular with parents. The expansion campaign is shaping up to be something of a referendum on L.A. Unified's performance. The memo repeatedly criticizes the district for failing to prepare students for college and careers, robbing Los Angeles of a better-trained, smarter workforce.

"The opportunity is ripe for a significant expansion of high-quality charter schools in Los Angeles," the memo states. "Thanks to the strength of its charter leaders and teachers, as well as its widespread civic and philanthropic support, Los Angeles is uniquely positioned to create the largest, highest-performing charter sector in the nation. Such an exemplar would serve as a model for all large cities to follow."

In Missouri, only students in St. Louis and Kansas City currently have access to public charter school options. In 2014, public charter schools enrolled 29 percent and 42 percent of all public school students in Saint Louis and Kansas City, respectively. Still, a demand for more quality public options exists in both cities.

Time will tell if something like the Broad plan would be right for Missouri. Until then, here are some fixes to our current charter system, which require a little less heavy lifting:

(1)   Make it easier for charter schools to acquire abandoned buildings.

(2)   Allow charter schools to open statewide

(3)   Provide equitable funding for public charter school students.

(4)   Fast-track the process for quality charter school replication.

All four of these would cost a lot less than $490 million, and would do a world of good for students in Missouri.

Restoring Trust in Government

Posted on by John Wright

Gallup released a poll last week finding that 75% of U.S. adults see widespread corruption in government. According to Gallup, the perception that government is corrupt has risen in the last decade from 2 in 3 to 3 in 4 people saying that they perceive government as corrupt. Compared to other countries with a free press, we did slightly better than Poland, Taiwan, and Cyprus—and slightly worse than Israel, Slovakia, and Belize.

If so many Americans see government as an institution plagued by widespread corruption, perhaps we should minimize the role of government in our society.

According to the Tax Foundation, this year, 31% of the nation’s income will go toward paying taxes. This means we’ll spend the first 114 days of the year working to pay for government.

Things are not much better if you focus only on our state. Missouri is not a low-tax state. And we’re one of the top states when it comes to the government picking winners and losers through corporate handouts.

There are a number of ways to minimize our dependence on government at the state and local levels, including: shifting services from the public sector to the private sector, freeing ourselves from onerous regulations, ending the routine practice of government officials doling out assistance to well-connected businesses, and giving parents the ability to choose which schools their children attend.

And of course, rooting out corruption means ensuring that government is as accountable as possible. No more backroom deals between government officials and government unions. In order to do this, we need to close the loophole in our state’s transparency laws that allows government officials to hold meetings with union officials behind closed doors. Because government unions play such an important role in the delivery of public services, they need to be as transparent and as accountable as possible.

If Missouri can implement these modest reforms, we’ll have taken a few big steps toward minimizing our dependence on government. And, I believe, restored trust in government won’t be too far behind.

 

Pine Lawn Considers Disbanding Their Police Department

Posted on by Joseph Miller

                Pine Lawn, a small city in North Saint Louis County, has begun exploring the possibility of disbanding its police department. If the city did so, it would likely turn over policing duties to the Saint Louis County Police Department (which already handles policing for more than a dozen municipalities along with unincorporated areas) or the new North County Police Cooperative, formed by Wellston and Vinita Park.

                While the process through which the city is considering such a change has created considerable controversy, there is little doubt that Pine Lawn is in serious need of reform. The city been a posterchild of civic dysfunction, with a former mayor indicted for corruption, irregularities in city expenditures, and a highly criticized criminal justice system that uses poorly trained officers to fund the city through citations. Specifically addressing the last point, a report from Better Together showed that as of 2013 Pine Lawn relied on fines and fees for almost 50% of its general revenue, making it one of the worst offenders of the Macks Creek Law (which capped fines to 30% of general revenue) in Saint Louis County:

                As we’ve written previously, until last this year the Macks Creek Law was regularly ignored and was without enforcement provisions. But with the passage of SB 5 in the last legislative session, things have changed. Cities like Pine Lawn can now collect no more than 12.5% of their general revenue via fines and fees. There are now regular reporting requirements, and failure to comply triggers a disincorporation vote.

                These new legal provisions spell trouble for the status quo in Pine Lawn. Instead of a cash cow, their police force is likely to become a financial burden. That has pushed Pine Lawn and cities like it to do what they should have done a long time ago: join with the county or other cities to provide cost-effective and professional policing.  

Ferguson Commission Misses the Mark on Unemployment

Posted on by John Wright

After weeks of deliberation, the Ferguson Commission released its report last week. The report contains a wide range of policy prescriptions, most of which are aimed at rectifying injustices facing the greater St. Louis community.

The report rightly makes the case that one of the biggest issues facing the St. Louis region is unemployment. It then goes on to recommend increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Something doesn’t add up here.

Study after study has shown that minimum wage increases cause unemployment. Laws that drive up the cost of labor and lead to the elimination of jobs are the opposite of what Saint Louis needs.

Oddly enough, the report acknowledges the role of training positions in its discussion of unemployment. From the report:

Internships and apprenticeships are valuable programs to both help students succeed in their careers, and help employers ensure they have a competent, trained workforce. By expanding internship and apprenticeship opportunities for high school and college students, and fostering collaboration between educators and employers in the development of these programs, Missouri can support better learning and economic outcomes that benefit individuals, companies, and communities.

How do the report’s authors envision increasing training opportunities while at the same time doubling the amount that low skilled laborers must be paid?

The Show-Me Institute recently did a video on the revitalization effort of St. Louis’s Dutchtown neighborhood. In that video we tell the story of JJ, a young man from south St. Louis who worked his way to the front of the house at a local restaurant after starting washing dishes. For people without formal work experience, starting at minimum wage and learning skills on the job is the often the only way to train and gain experience. By pulling the bottom rung of the economic ladder up out of reach, a minimum wage increase will make it more difficult for people to move up in our economy.

It seems that the Ferguson Commission wants to propose policies that will help revitalize the underserved parts of our city and improve the lives of those that the system is failing. By calling for a minimum wage increase, they risk making things worse.

Myths of Education Reform

Posted on by Michael Q. McShane
Show-Me Institute's new Director of Education Policy, Michael McShane, digs into the myths and facts about education reform in Missouri. Is there any truth behind common arguments like "St. Louis and Kansas City are the only places in need of reform," "Expanding charter schools would harm public schools," and "Missouri's Blaine amendment makes private school choice impossible"? Watch and find out!
 

Second All-Girls Charter School to Open

Posted on by Brittany Wagner

This school year, Hawthorn Leadership Academy opened its doors as the first all-girls public charter school in Missouri. Now, the state Board of Education has approved an application for a second all-girls public charter school—Tessera Hall.

Tessera Hall will open to sixth- and seventh-graders, but will expand to include grades 8 through 12 in South St. Louis City during the 2016–2017 academic year. As the Post-Dispatch reported, a group of St. Elizabeth Academy alumni started working to build the school after St. Elizabeth closed in 2013.

Like the once private, religious De La Salle Middle School, which reopened this year as a public charter school, St. Elizabeth struggled with enrollment. Mike McShane, who recently joined the Show-Me Institute as the Director of Education Policy, wrote about this phenomenon in Sector Switchers: Why Catholic Schools Convert to Charters and What Happens Next. While charters like La Salle no longer deliver a religious education, access to public dollars allows them to remain open, ultimately carrying on their mission—providing a quality educational service to a low-income population.

Tessera Hall’s charter school application says it plans to recruit young women in low-performing schools like Roosevelt High School, where 70% of girls score below basic in mathematics. The application reads:

The proposed mission, curriculum, teaching methods and services of Tessera Hall Academy are designed to meet the particular needs of the adolescent urban girls of St. Louis by providing an inclusive and academically challenging experience in a safe, affirming, and empowering environment that enables these young women to achieve success in college, become civicminded leaders, and be resilient life-long learners.

I look forward to hearing more about the state’s second single gender public charter school, as well as other future charter school options. The Missouri State Board of Education accepts charter school applications up until the December board meeting.

Single gender or mixed, students need more quality educational choices. 

A Good Idea from the Post-Dispatch

Posted on by Michael Rathbone

David Nicklaus’ latest column, “Tax credit would be better for workers than minimum wage hike,” is one well worth reading. In it, he talks about how those opposed to a minimum wage increase need to offer an alternative policy proposal instead of just saying no. Mr. Nicklaus suggests that Missouri create a state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) to supplement the federal credit and increase the incomes of the working poor.

                Economists across the political spectrum have been recommending this for years. The Congressional Budget Office, David Neumark, and even Christina Romer  find the EITC is a better policy option than the minimum wage for helping low-income households.

                There a couple of reasons why the EITC is a better policy option than the minimum wage. First, it is specifically targeted to help low-income households. The minimum wage isn’t as well targeted. For example, a teen flipping burgers and making the minimum wage would benefit from a higher minimum wage even if both of her parents are surgeons. The EITC only goes to households making below a certain amount. Secondly, the EITC doesn’t increase labor costs. Increasing the minimum wage means employers will have to pay their employees more per hour. The EITC is a direct government benefit, so businesses won’t have those increased costs.

                The EITC is not a perfect program. It makes a lot of improper payments , costing taxpayers billions. Also, its complicated nature makes it necessary for many people to hire professional tax preparers so that they can receive the credit.

                Despite these drawbacks, the EITC is still a superior alternative to the minimum wage    

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging