• Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show-Me InstituteShow-Me Institute
Show-Me InstituteShow-Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
×

Education / School Choice

The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly From The State Board Of Education Meeting

By James V. Shuls on Oct 17, 2012

More charter schools, a change in Saint Louis Public Schools’ accreditation status . . . Get the low-down from yesterday’s Missouri State Board of Education meeting with my recap of the good, the bad, and the ugly from the proceedings.

The Good:

The board approved two new charter schools: Eagle College Prep and Lafayette Preparatory Academy. Curt Fuchs, coordinator of educational support services for the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), remarked that the applications were exceptionally strong. After having talked briefly with school leaders from both schools, I am very optimistic that these schools will be highly successful.

The Bad:

The board granted provisional accreditation status to the Saint Louis Public School District. Not that this was a bad decision, in fact, it probably was the right decision. The district met the minimum criteria laid out under DESE’s old accreditation system: the Missouri School Improvement Plan 4 (MSIP). The problem with this is threefold: (1) The bar for provisional accreditation is too low, (2) accreditation status is essentially meaningless, and (3) parents need information at the school level, not the district level.

The state is improving the accreditation system to MSIP 5, but this does not negate the fact that school accountability should come from parents armed with information, not from the state board. An “A” to “F” school grading system would help accomplish this.

The Ugly:

The most disturbing thing from the state board meeting was not anything that was voted upon; rather, it was the overall attitude that the board must micromanage schools, even charter schools. For more than a decade, Missouri has tried accountability systems run at the state level, with little success. It is time to move past the notion that we can prescribe solutions for public education. We need an atmosphere where educational entrepreneurs want to come and innovators can thrive. That can become a reality if we empower schools to make decisions and provide families with options.

Topics on this page
MissouriMissouri Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationSt. Louis Public SchoolsMissouri State Board of Education
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

James V. Shuls

Senior Fellow of Education Policy

More about this author >
Footer Logo
Support the Show-Me-Institute
Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected].

Mission Statement
Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved