• Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Corporate Welfare

More Proof that Missouri’s LIHTC Doesn’t Work

By Elias Tsapelas on Oct 25, 2019
Guy building house

sculpies / Shutterstock

The numbers are in: Missouri’s low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) program fails to deliver. The program was supposed to increase the amount of available affordable housing across the state. But reports from the Missouri Housing Development Commission (MHDC) show that Missouri’s LIHTC program simply wasn’t working.

Each year, the federal government allocates funds for the LIHTC program, and historically Missouri has matched each dollar. In 2017, Missouri’s governor halted the state’s portion of the program after multiple reports showed glaring problems. The pause in state credit issuance allows policymakers to look back and determine whether the state’s LIHTC program ever had a meaningful impact. 

According to project approval data from the MHDC, there was little change in federal LIHTC applications in 2018, the first full year without the state’s LIHTC program. Projects can vary in size so it’s important to look at the number of units being subsidized. Last year more than 2,200 units were funded solely by the federal LIHTC program, which exceeds the average over the previous four years (where Missouri was matching each federal dollar) by more than 400. This indicates that project developers still believe there is money to be made on low-income housing. In short, the program was zeroed out and nothing changed.

The LIHTC program essentially functions as a way to help finance construction. Eliminating Missouri’s contribution may have simply changed the way developers choose to make their profits. For example, the MHDC data show a large increase in approved LIHTC rehabilitation projects for 2018, but a small decline for new construction. There is also a sharp increase in the estimated average cost per unit of approved new construction projects. The point being, as long as a project remains profitable, developers will find a way to make it happen, no matter what they tell Missouri policymakers.

Despite the overblown claims of the negative consequences from eliminating Missouri’s LIHTC program, the state’s affordable housing landscape appears to be moving in the right direction. If policymakers want to save Missouri taxpayers millions of dollars and strike a blow against crony capitalism, it appears there is no greater opportunity than leaving LIHTC behind.

 

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

Elias Tsapelas

Director of State Budget and Fiscal Policy

More about this author >
    Footer Logo
    Support the Show-Me-Institute
    Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Donate
    • About
    • Contact

    Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected]

    Mission Statement
    Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

    © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved