• Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show-Me InstituteShow-Me Institute
Show-Me InstituteShow-Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
×

Economy / Business Climate

Arizona State License Portability Study Highlights Reciprocity Benefits

By Corianna Baier on Mar 16, 2020
Construction site

fuyu liu / Shutterstock

As my colleague Patrick Ishmael has written, the Missouri legislature is considering bills on occupational licensing reciprocity. In short, a state that adopts “universal” or “unilateral” licensing reciprocity is one that accepts the licenses of qualified professionals from other states without requiring an extensive, and potentially duplicative, relicensing process of its own. Accepting qualified professionals in this manner expands the pool of providers of these goods and services and puts downward pressure on prices thanks to greater competition. Under present circumstances, such an expansion of supply is not only preferable—it’s necessary to support public health.

States, including Missouri, have adopted other licensing policies, including the establishment of interstate “compacts” and agreements between and among states that provide some reciprocity features, but a recent paper out of Arizona State University’s Center for the Study of Economic Liberty highlights the downfalls of that and other forms of licensing portability. The paper argues that broad-based occupational licensing reciprocity is a better way to “open the broadest avenues to opportunity for the most workers in the shortest amount of time,” and although interstate compacts and multistate licenses increase license portability, they take a lot of work to set up and only provide portability for specific professions within the states that join.

A better alternative to our current system is the one we propose: broad-based licensing reciprocity. As the ASU paper explains:

Unlike compacts, universal licensing reciprocity can: 

  1. be broad-based and cover a wide range of workers; and, 
  2. encourage competition between states in terms of the requirements to obtain a license — or even whether a state should mandate an occupational license at all. 

Broad-based licensing reciprocity is a better route for portability reform as it avoids the pitfalls of our current system and enhances economic opportunity and competition. Hopefully the continued research in favor of licensing reciprocity will lead to favorable legislation that increases opportunities for workers.

Topics on this page
Missouri
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

Corianna Baier

More about this author >
Footer Logo
Support the Show-Me-Institute
Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected].

Mission Statement
Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved