Twenty-six states were party to the lawsuit, but Missouri was not among them. Even though Missourians signaled their overwhelming opposition to the health care regulation by passing Proposition C, Missouri’s attorney general, Chris Koster, didn’t jump on board.

This ruling is good news for Missourians. If the Supreme Court upholds this ruling, Congress will not be able to force people to buy something that they don’t want.

Hopefully, this foreshadows success for Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder’s own lawsuit challenging the health care reform law. So far, two federal judges have upheld the law, but two have ruled that it is unconstitutional (a lawsuit in Virginia, and now this multistate lawsuit in Florida).

We have followed the Florida lawsuit very closely at the Show-Me Institute, and we will continue to track it as it progresses through the courts.

The full text of the Florida ruling is available online.

The post Judge in Florida Overturns Federal Health Care Law appeared first on Show-Me Institute.

The Globe thinks that the political infighting between the governor and the lieutenant governor could be ended by having them elected on a ticket, as opposed to the current system in which they each run independently. Our current system has resulted in Missouri having a governor and lieutenant governor from opposite parties five times, or for 20 cumulative years, since World War II. From 1977 to 1993, we had different parties holding the two offices every year. The Globe is certainly right that changing that system might end the infighting, although the governor and lieutenant governor in Illinois were both Democrats, and they hated each other before the governor was forced to (how should I put this nicely?) step aside in preparation for a lifestyle change. But anyway …

Even though the Globe is correct that political sniping might decrease, I don’t support electing the lieutenant governor on a ticket with the governor. My antennas go up whenever anyone advocates making government run more smoothly so they can go out and get things done for the working people of this state! (The last sentence should be read aloud, like a politician giving a stump speech.) The Globe quotes former state Sen. Richard Webster:

He proposed that the candidates for the two offices appear together as a unit on the ballot, thus encouraging a spirit of cooperation and heading off the sort of political gamesmanship evident now.

I take P.J. O’Rourke’s attitude that preventing politicians from governing is like preventing a pit bull from eating your child, so needless to say I don’t give a whit about making government function more smoothly. (Streamlining government services in order to save tax dollars is a different story.)

When Missourians go to the polls on vote on the lieutenant governor, they know (at least, some of them know) that they are electing someone for two main jobs: to step in as governor during extreme circumstances (which just happened in 2000), and to serve as a tie-breaking vote in the Senate. If the people of the state want someone who belongs to a different party than the governor to serve in those roles, that should be up to them.

The fact is that Missourians chose Jay Nixon to be governor and Peter Kinder to be lieutenant governor. If they had run on a ticket, Missouri would have gotten a lieutenant governor that the majority of the state did not want to elect. I think that giving people the fullest choice possible, so they can elect the person that they wanted to elect, is the most important thing. If we have to live with a poorly functioning tourism board as a result, that is fine with me.

The post The Role of the Lieutenant Governor in Missouri appeared first on Show-Me Institute.

This is something I can write about because it is a tax I pay. My wife and I pay unemployment taxes for our child’s caregiver, and five times a year I calculate the tax and mail it in. (Four times for the state, and once for the feds.) This is not withheld from a paycheck, it is entirely employer-paid. I love what the Lt. Gov. said here:

“We are here to say no,” Mr. Kinder said. “This is essentially a federal bribe to change state law permanently, and the bribe lasts two years.”

And, after those two years, employers are going to have to pay higher taxes permanently. They have already increased the state’s unemployment tax wage base for 2009 — and I think that increase is the only increase employers should be forced to pay. As I said, the whole thing is just so depressing, pun intended.

The post I Say Missouri Should Refuse the Stimulus Unemployment Funds appeared first on Show-Me Institute.

Here is a case study in priorities.

There are 121,000 kids without health insurance in Missouri.

And Matt Blunt and Peter Kinder are spending $1 million dollars on… a bike race.

Of course, I agree that health care is a critical priority for the Missouri government — even though Fired Up! is unlikely to agree with me that the best way to get people the care they actually need is through providing tax incentives for individual policies and eliminating red tape that gums up the workings of the market.

Fired Up! is right on the money, though, that a bike race is a ridiculous government expenditure. There may be many good reasons for a prominent race in Missouri — prestige, tourism, competition with neighboring states — but, as economist Frédéric Bastiat would have pointed out, every action has both effects that are obvious and effects that are hidden. An exciting race is an effect that we can see, but every dollar taken from taxpayers to spend on a bicycle race is a dollar that can’t go toward filling up a gas tank, buying groceries, taking a child to piano lessons, or, say, buying a bicycle — all effects that we can’t see.

Thanks to the diffuse costs and concentrated benefits of special interest politics, these hidden effects go almost entirely unnoticed by the general public. But a $1 million expenditure that seems measly in political terms is actually a huge aggregate amount, sucked from the economy and redistributed to politically favored recipients. Frankly, a state-sponsored bicycle race is a bad idea for the same reason that HB 327 was a bad idea — government spending on favored economic ventures makes everybody else a little bit poorer.

The post The Hidden Effects of Government Spending appeared first on Show-Me Institute.

School districts will have to do more work if they want to start school in mid-August next year. At a ceremony in Branson on Monday, Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder signed a bill
requiring schools to begin their school year no sooner than 10 days
before Labor Day.

The caveat to this new law is that school districts who want to start earlier would have to have a public meeting and voter approval every year to set the start date of schools before the 10-day requirement. Again, the state is taking local decisionmaking outside of the school districts, which would know better than the state of Missouri when to start school to make sure their students receive the best educations.

The post State Takes Aim at the Start of School appeared first on Show-Me Institute.

In Jefferson City, criticism has focused on whether the tax credit bill
was designed solely for McKee. Some legislators were upset that the
far-reaching measure was tucked into the governor’s economic
development bill.

Also, at this moment, McKee seems to be a bad landlord for the more than 400 properties he owns, according to April Ford-Griffith, the alderman for the area that McKee has bought the most property in:

The alderman said that properties linked to McKee are left unkempt,
with uncut grass and open entrances that invite crime. She has heard
many complaints about the properties, though she said she does not know
what McKee plans.

Economic development in this sense is a bad thing. It’s not the power of the market leading development here, but a bloated tax credit that, in itself, is a bad idea — and it’s developed for one person rather than for a whole group. Redevelopment should involved investors putting in their own money, not taking taxpayers’ dollars to pay for what they want.

The post The One (Hundred) Million Dollar Man. appeared first on Show-Me Institute.