School Choice Case Study: Charter Schools in Los Angeles

Education |
By Cory Koedel | Read Time 2 min

A 2024 study published in Education Finance and Policy finds that enrollment in one of five popular charter high schools in Los Angeles significantly improves student test scores, as well as college enrollment and persistence.

This study stands out for its rigorous research design, which credibly estimates the causal effects of attending these schools. Each of the five schools is oversubscribed, meaning more students want to attend than the number of available seats. Admission is determined by random lottery: students whose numbers are randomly drawn are offered admission, while those not selected are not. By comparing outcomes for lottery winners and losers, the researchers can isolate the causal impacts of attending the charter schools on student outcomes.

The schools serve a predominantly low-income Black and Latino population and adhere to the “no excuses” charter model. This model features extended instructional time, mandatory uniforms, strict discipline and structure, and high expectations around academic performance and college attendance. Although “no excuses” schools have recently fallen out of favor, research—including this study—continues to show their effectiveness. The authors describe their findings as showing “large positive effects of enrolling in a high-quality, ‘no excuses’ charter school on academic achievement, enrollment in any college, enrollment in any four-year college, and persistence to the second year of a four-year college” (p. 568).

(The reasons why the “no excuses” model has fallen out of favor are perplexing to me, but this is a topic for a different time. It is especially frustrating because one reason this study is possible—along with numerous other similar studies—is that no excuses schools are regularly oversubscribed, which is a direct indicator that families value them.)

This study contributes to what is now a large body of research showing the transformative potential of school choice. In the face of mounting evidence on the poor performance of Missouri schools, we should embrace policies that can lead to meaningful improvements in student outcomes, including policies that create more school-choice opportunities for our children.

Thumbnail image credit: Structured Vision / Shutterstock
Cory Koedel

About the Author

Cory Koedel is a tenured professor of economics and public policy at the University of Missouri-Columbia. His research focuses broadly on the economics of education, and he has spent more than 20 years studying ways to improve school performance. Dr. Koedel’s work has been published in top peer-reviewed academic journals in the fields of economics, public policy, and education, and he has presented his research widely at national conferences, think tanks, and academic institutions. He currently sits on the editorial boards for three academic journals: Education Finance and Policy, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, and Research in Higher Education. Additionally, Dr. Koedel has contributed his expertise as a member of advisory boards and review panels for numerous school districts, state and federal agencies, and non-profit organizations. His significant contributions to the field have been recognized through several honors, including the 2008 Outstanding Dissertation Award from the American Educational Research Association (Division L) and the 2012 Junior Scholar Award from the same organization. He earned his bachelor’s degree in economics and history in 2000 and his PhD in economics in 2007, both from the University of California, San Diego.

Similar Stories

Support Us

The work of the Show-Me Institute would not be possible without the generous support of people who are inspired by the vision of liberty and free enterprise. We hope you will join our efforts and become a Show-Me Institute sponsor.

Donate
Man on Horse Charging