<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawsuit Archives - Show-Me Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://showmeinstitute.org/ttd-topic/lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/ttd-topic/lawsuit/</link>
	<description>Where Liberty Comes First</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Missouri AG Catherine Hanaway Discusses the State&#8217;s Lawsuit Against Kansas City</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/state-and-local-government/missouri-ag-catherine-hanaway-discusses-the-states-lawsuit-against-kansas-city/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[State and Local Government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://showmeinstitute.org/?p=604297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On July 30, 2026, while guest hosting Mundo in the Morning on KCMO Talk Radio, Patrick Tuohey spoke with Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway about her office&#8217;s lawsuit against Kansas [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/state-and-local-government/missouri-ag-catherine-hanaway-discusses-the-states-lawsuit-against-kansas-city/">Missouri AG Catherine Hanaway Discusses the State&#8217;s Lawsuit Against Kansas City</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe title="Missouri AG Catherine Hanaway Discusses the State&amp;apos;s Lawsuit Against Kansas City" width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yx4KEwvKy70?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>On July 30, 2026, while guest hosting <a href="https://www.kcmotalkradio.com/shows/mundo-in-the-morning-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Mundo in the Morning</em></a> on KCMO Talk Radio, Patrick Tuohey spoke with Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway about her <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/state-and-local-government/show-me-institute-shines-light-on-kansas-citys-discrimination-policies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">office&#8217;s lawsuit against Kansas City</a> over its race- and sex-conscious contracting preferences.</p>
<p><a href="https://apple.co/3TrfK3C" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Listen to more from KCMO Talk Radio here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/state-and-local-government/missouri-ag-catherine-hanaway-discusses-the-states-lawsuit-against-kansas-city/">Missouri AG Catherine Hanaway Discusses the State&#8217;s Lawsuit Against Kansas City</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson County Reassessment Lawsuits Roll Onward</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/economy/jackson-county-reassessment-lawsuits-roll-onward/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://showmeinstitute.org/?p=603947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The movie The Odyssey is being released next month, and that’s appropriate for the Jackson County assessment district because the county is truly between Scylla and Charybdis now. The reassessment [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/economy/jackson-county-reassessment-lawsuits-roll-onward/">Jackson County Reassessment Lawsuits Roll Onward</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie <em>The Odyssey</em> is being released next month, and that’s appropriate for the Jackson County assessment district because the county is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Between_Scylla_and_Charybdis">truly between Scylla and Charybdis</a> now. The <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/taxes/jackson-county-assessment-facts-part-four/">reassessment process in Jackson County</a> has been a disaster for over a decade now. The only thing I will say in defense of the county and the assessor’s office is that Jackson County was underassessed for a long time. (My explanation as to why that was <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/municipal-policy/jackson-county-assessment-facts-part-1/">can be found here</a>.) The process to accurately assess property within Jackson County was never going to be easy or fun, but the county <a href="https://www.kctv5.com/2024/08/07/state-tax-commission-orders-jackson-county-fix-some-2023-assessments/">has failed at the overall process</a> by any measure.</p>
<p>Jackson County has begun attempting to correct its <a href="https://www.kcur.org/housing-development-section/2023-09-15/independence-sues-jackson-county-over-inconsistent-and-unfair-property-assessments">poorly conducted reassessments in 2023</a> and 2025. It will do this by retroactively <a href="https://www.kctv5.com/2025/10/17/sigh-relief-jackson-county-moves-roll-back-commercial-property-assessments/">rolling back property assessments</a> for some property owners, sending refunds to other taxpayers, and withholding future tax funds from other taxing entities, such as fire districts, to make up for the overpayments by taxpayers in 2023 and 2025. The county has to withhold future payments because counties collect all the property taxes within the county, but then distribute almost all of that money to other taxing districts. Jackson County does not have a large pot of its own money it can make amends from. Not surprisingly, some of those <a href="https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/jackson-county/article316186972.html">taxing entities are suing</a> over the withholding of their future tax payments.</p>
<p>The problem is, those school districts and other taxing entities were not the ones who caused the problems in 2023 and 2025. They followed the rules, set their tax rates, received their tax money, and spent it. Now they are being told they have to give some of it back.</p>
<p>So, I understand the objections by the taxing districts, but I have much more sympathy for the taxpayers who were victimized by a poor process over the past few reassessments. The Jackson County assessor’s office, among other problems, failed to<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sihrX32uq1M"> provide taxpayers with the rights of appeal and relief</a> they were entitled to during the process. So, yes, some taxpayers were overcharged because they did not have their full opportunity to appeal their taxes.</p>
<p>In short, the new Jackson County leadership team deserves credit for changing course and finally trying to correct the problems and refund money to some taxpayers.  I think the taxpayers deserve these refunds—and the entire process <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/taxes/jackson-county-property-tax-assessment-update/">needs wholesale changes</a>.</p>
<p>I have no idea how the courts will rule in this lawsuit. I’ll be following it closely. Hopefully this controversy and similar, <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/taxes/platte-county-agreement-could-be-a-model-for-missouri/">recent issues in Platte County can lead to massive changes</a> in how we conduct property reassessments in Missouri.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/economy/jackson-county-reassessment-lawsuits-roll-onward/">Jackson County Reassessment Lawsuits Roll Onward</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies Pushing Back Against Government Overreach</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/regulation/companies-pushing-back-against-government-overreach/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/companies-pushing-back-against-government-overreach/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Three food delivery companies are suing New York City over its cap on commissions the companies can charge restaurants to use their services. According to a Wall Street Journal article, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/regulation/companies-pushing-back-against-government-overreach/">Companies Pushing Back Against Government Overreach</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three food delivery companies are suing New York City over its cap on commissions the companies can charge restaurants to use their services. According to a <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/grubhub-doordash-uber-eats-sue-new-york-city-over-fee-caps-11631237227?mod=hp_lead_pos5">article</a>, DoorDash Inc., Grubhub Inc., and Uber Technologies are “contending that the fee cap is harmful and constitutes government overreach.” I’m glad companies are pushing back on government interference in the market; businesses and consumers should be decision makers in the market, not lawmakers.</p>
<p>St. Louis City has one of these <a href="https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/city-laws/ordinances/ordinance.cfm?ord=71193">caps</a> too. The St. Louis Board of Aldermen passed an <a href="https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/city-laws/upload/legislative/Ordinances/BOAPdf/71193.pdf">ordinance</a> in July of 2020 that sets a cap on fees that third-party delivery services charge restaurants at 20 percent (up from the 5 percent originally proposed). This ordinance includes a sunset measure that ends the cap 60 days after the city’s health <a href="https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/health/communicable-disease/covid-19/orders/upload/Mayoral-Proclamation-23JUL21.pdf">proclamation</a> has been lifted.</p>
<p>Previous agreements between restaurants and delivery services generally set fees higher than 20 percent. The city’s health proclamation is still in place, so this arbitrary cap has been intruding in the market for about 15 months. As <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/blog/regulation/st-louis-lawmakers-should-stay-out-of-business-decisions/">predicted</a>, consumers have been experiencing the effects. For example, DoorDash added a regulatory response <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/blog/regulation/were-already-seeing-the-effects-of-delivery-fee-regulation/">fee</a> on all delivery orders in St. Louis City (and other places across the country) with a spokesperson <a href="https://www.riverfronttimes.com/foodblog/2021/02/15/doordash-defends-charging-customers-extra-1-st-louis-fee">noting</a> that this fee was necessary to pay drivers appropriately amid pricing regulations.</p>
<p>The contention between delivery companies and lawmakers seems to exist nationwide, and it’s coming to a head with this lawsuit. I’m not a lawyer, but I think workers and consumers have paid the price for lawmaker interference in the market for long enough. St. Louis City should remove this cap now to avoid any potential repercussions from the lawsuit and to honor market arrangements between delivery services and restaurants.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/regulation/companies-pushing-back-against-government-overreach/">Companies Pushing Back Against Government Overreach</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>That’s One Way to Do It—but It’s Certainly Not the Only Way</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/school-choice/thats-one-way-to-do-it-but-its-certainly-not-the-only-way/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/thats-one-way-to-do-it-but-its-certainly-not-the-only-way/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What is more likely to give families relief—administrative action or the court system? Missouri’s attorney general has opted for the latter. The attorney general filed a lawsuit in an effort [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/school-choice/thats-one-way-to-do-it-but-its-certainly-not-the-only-way/">That’s One Way to Do It—but It’s Certainly Not the Only Way</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is more likely to give families relief—administrative action or the court system? Missouri’s attorney general has <a href="https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/missouri-attorney-general-eric-schmitt-files-lawsuit-targeting-school-district-mask-rules/article_7e3a0bcc-7e54-5b2e-a7f5-91572c62d5e4.html">opted for the latter</a>. The attorney general filed a lawsuit in an effort to prevent families from having to send their children back to school in masks. This lawsuit would make it illegal for a school district to have a mask mandate. How likely is that approach to have an effect within the necessary time frame?</p>
<p>A lot of families have found out just this week whether their children will have to wear masks full time when they head back to school. And a lot of families on both sides are very angry. I believe that these families should not be forced to put their children in physically upsetting circumstances—whether that’s mandatory masking or optional masking—and that they need options to move their children to a different educational environment as quickly as possible. The school year is starting or has already started. The court system is slow.</p>
<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/health-miami-coronavirus-pandemic-74bda875808bad100010bee9430242cb">Florida</a> and <a href="https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2021-08-24/arizona-program-gives-vouchers-to-parents-pulling-kids-out-of-mask-mandating-schools#:~:text=Families%20in%20Arizona%20whose%20children,most%20recent%20coronavirus%20relief%20package.">Arizona</a> have expanded existing scholarship programs to qualify families who have strong preferences on masking policy. Missouri could do the same. We have a new empowerment scholarship account that will become law in days. That program could provide the structure and federal stimulus funds—of which Missouri has received billions for education—could provide the means to put scholarships in the hands of families.  Unconventional times call for unconventional solutions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/school-choice/thats-one-way-to-do-it-but-its-certainly-not-the-only-way/">That’s One Way to Do It—but It’s Certainly Not the Only Way</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attendance Matters</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/accountability/attendance-matters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/attendance-matters/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a principal and a vice principal from the Riverview Gardens School District filed a lawsuit alleging that district administrators falsified attendance records. The district has denied the claims. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/accountability/attendance-matters/">Attendance Matters</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a principal and a vice principal from the Riverview Gardens School District <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/education/riverview-gardens-falsified-attendance-reports-administrators-allege-in-lawsuits/article_bf1b487c-0a7c-53e4-9daf-3aeb8435fb55.html?utm_content=buffere92a3&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter.com&amp;utm_campaign=buffer">filed a lawsuit</a> alleging that district administrators falsified attendance records. The district has denied the claims.</p>
<p>At this point, nothing has been established—all we know is that an accusation has been made and denied. But in any case, attendance numbers are more important than many people realize. Not only do attendance data affect how much funding the district receives from the state, but they also factor in the Annual Performance Review and the district’s accreditation classification.</p>
<p>Last December, the State Board of Education <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/blog/accountability/riverview-gardens-students-lose-right-transfer">voted unanimously</a> to reclassify Riverview Gardens as provisionally accredited. According to state law, because the district was no longer unaccredited, students from Riverview Gardens lost the <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/sites/default/files/Interdistrict%20Choice%20-%20Shuls_0.pdf">right to transfer</a> to better-performing districts. If the accreditation of the district was based on incorrect attendance information, then students may have been unfairly deprived of better educational opportunities.</p>
<p>I do not doubt that there has been real progress in the district in the past few years, but the integrity of the attendance numbers is vital so that the district can be evaluated according to its true performance. We will continue to watch this story closely as it develops.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/accountability/attendance-matters/">Attendance Matters</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deathblow to St. Louis Charter Schools?</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/school-choice/deathblow-to-st-louis-charter-schools/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Choice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/deathblow-to-st-louis-charter-schools/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Saint Louis Public Schools are suing the state for 42 million dollars, claiming this money was improperly sent to charter schools. If charter schools have to turn over this money, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/school-choice/deathblow-to-st-louis-charter-schools/">Deathblow to St. Louis Charter Schools?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saint Louis Public Schools are suing the state for 42 million dollars, claiming this money was improperly sent to charter schools. If charter schools have to turn over this money, they will be financially crippled. Click on the link to see the video.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/school-choice/deathblow-to-st-louis-charter-schools/">Deathblow to St. Louis Charter Schools?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Tuohey on Ruckus</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/economy/patrick-tuohey-on-ruckus-3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/patrick-tuohey-on-ruckus-4/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Show-Me Institute&#39;s Patrick Tuohey appeared on Ruckus on February 18 to discuss education spending in Kansas, the earnings tax in Missouri, and the Kansas City convention hotel lawsuit. Click [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/economy/patrick-tuohey-on-ruckus-3/">Patrick Tuohey on Ruckus</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Show-Me Institute&#39;s Patrick Tuohey appeared on Ruckus on February 18 to discuss education spending in Kansas, the earnings tax in Missouri, and the Kansas City convention hotel lawsuit. Click the link above to see the entire program.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/economy/patrick-tuohey-on-ruckus-3/">Patrick Tuohey on Ruckus</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show-Me Now! Outrageous: Your Money, Their Choice?</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/subsidies/show-me-now-outrageous-your-money-their-choice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 08:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/show-me-now-outrageous-your-money-their-choice/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Show-Me Institute Policy Analyst Joseph Miller explains that the Regional Sports Authority (RSA) is using taxpayer money to sue the city of Saint Louis. Their lawsuit would prevent a vote [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/subsidies/show-me-now-outrageous-your-money-their-choice/">Show-Me Now! Outrageous: Your Money, Their Choice?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show-Me Institute Policy Analyst Joseph Miller explains that the Regional Sports Authority (RSA) is using taxpayer money to sue the city of Saint Louis. Their lawsuit would prevent a vote to decide whether city taxpayers will finance a new football stadium.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/subsidies/show-me-now-outrageous-your-money-their-choice/">Show-Me Now! Outrageous: Your Money, Their Choice?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show-Me Now! No More Tangles For Hair Braiders?</title>
		<link>https://showmeinstitute.org/article/uncategorized/show-me-now-no-more-tangles-for-hair-braiders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 05:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeinstitute.local/show-me-now-no-more-tangles-for-hair-braiders/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>David Stokes, the Show-Me Institute Director of Local Government Policy, talks about the Institute for Justice&#8217;s lawsuit challenging Missouri&#8217;s onerous licensing requirements for African-style hair braiders.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/uncategorized/show-me-now-no-more-tangles-for-hair-braiders/">Show-Me Now! No More Tangles For Hair Braiders?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Stokes, the Show-Me Institute Director of Local Government Policy, talks about the Institute for Justice&#8217;s lawsuit challenging Missouri&#8217;s onerous licensing requirements for African-style hair braiders.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org/article/uncategorized/show-me-now-no-more-tangles-for-hair-braiders/">Show-Me Now! No More Tangles For Hair Braiders?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://showmeinstitute.org">Show-Me Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
