• Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • MOGE
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • MOGE
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
×

Uncategorized

Quibbles and Bits

By Eric D. Dixon on Nov 1, 2007

In addition to David Stokes’ criticisms of the otherwise excellent West End Word piece about Rex Sinquefield and the Show-Me Institute, I have a quibble of my own. Toward the end of the article is this paragraph:

The ideological bent of the Show-Me Institute can be found in its 2006 annual report in unintended ways. Among the institute’s many achievements, it touts a “groundbreaking look at how to end the earnings taxes in St. Louis and Kansas City”; it makes no mention of a follow-up study (which came out in January 2007) about a land tax, economist Joseph Haslag’s recommended way of plugging the $130 million-a-year hole in the city’s budget. Sinquefield called this “an oversight.”

Now, because I edited our annual report, I might feel too protective of it. But this was no oversight. We didn’t mention Haslag’s January 2007 study in our 2006 annual report because it was released in 2007 — not 2006. As with most other organizations that issue annual reports, we restricted its focus to the things we accomplished in the year that the report covers. I myself am mentioned nowhere in the 2006 annual report, even though a large portion of it is my own work — because I wasn’t a Show-Me Institute employee in 2006.

We did make one exception to this general rule, for the inside page of the back cover, in a section titled "Going Forward". We decided that a one-page summary of where we’ve been since 2006 would be appropriate, especially because we issued the annual report so late in the year (waiting for a thorough audit to be completed). That might have been a good place for a more specific mention of Haslag’s January 2007 study, but really, that section was all about broad strokes and didn’t get into many details.

So we didn’t exclude the land tax study from our 2006 annual report because of an ideological bias or an oversight. I think it’s an excellent piece of scholarship, and I’d have happily included it if it had been published just a month sooner.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

Eric D. Dixon

More about this author >
Footer Logo
Support the Show-Me-Institute
Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected].

Mission Statement
Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved