• Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
State and Local Government / Transportation

Lower Costs Or Just Lowball Estimates For A New Terminal?

By Joseph Miller on Oct 2, 2013

Recent public disclosures for Kansas City’s new airline terminal proposal have become more confusing and contradictory. The Kansas City Aviation Department needs to release more thorough information as to why its cost estimates for a new terminal are decreasing.

According to the Kansas City Business Journal, the new terminal plan could cost anywhere between $960 million and $1.35 billion; however, officials with the Aviation Department do not expect costs to go above $1.2 billion and believe they can drive costs down to about $900 million. While these statements make it seem as though $1.2 billion is the cost ceiling for the terminal, the Aviation Department’s Advance Terminal Planning Study puts the expected cost at more than $1.2 billion. That baseline (not ceiling) estimate includes construction, core terminal requirements, necessary new parking structures, repairs to the airfield, and a modest construction overrun cushion.

While construction delays and other unexpected costs could lead to significantly more than $1.2 billion, what are the exigencies through which the Aviation Department could drive down the cost to $960 million, or even $900 million? That would require a savings of $263 million to $323 million, which is more than the costs of all the proposed repairs and improvements to the airport’s runways.  Other than cutting a large, integral part of the new terminal project, there does not seem to be anything in the current plan that could reduce costs to $900 million.

To give the benefit of the doubt to the Aviation Department, let us assume that this is one of the first construction projects in the history of the United States with no construction contingencies required, saving the project 15 percent. In this highly improbable scenario, to reach the hoped-for estimates, the project would need an additional $80 million to $140 million in savings, more than any single component in the Aviation Department’s plans.

The new terminal project is being sold to the public on the argument that its design is efficient and the old terminal is inadequate. The Aviation Department should explain which sections of this plan are not necessary or where the initial cost estimates were overzealous. After this approach is taken to other refurbishment approaches as well, the public can make an informed decision about whether Kansas City International (KCI) needs a new terminal.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

Joseph Miller

More about this author >
    Footer Logo
    Support the Show-Me-Institute
    Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Donate
    • About
    • Contact

    Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected]

    Mission Statement
    Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

    © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved