• Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
State and Local Government / Transparency

Don’t Hate the Players, Hate the Game

By Audrey Spalding on Nov 30, 2010

The Post-Dispatch has an excellent article that illustrates one reason why government tax incentives for private development almost always fall short. To summarize: Government officials usually fail to make sure that private companies deliver on the promises they make in exchange for taxpayer dollars.

In this case, the city of Saint Louis entered into an agreement with the Cardinals baseball team about eight years ago, when the team decided to build a new stadium. In exchange for tax incentives from the city worth $145 million, the Cardinals agreed to a few obligations, including at least 100,000 free tickets and 486,000 discounted tickets each year. And, if the owners sold the team, the agreement specified that the city would receive a portion of the sales profit.

It appears that city officials did not even attempt to make sure that the team upheld its side of the bargain.

From the article:

The team’s 2002 agreement with the city did not require proof that the team was giving away 100,000 tickets a year, or making 486,000 inexpensive seats available to the public, or giving $100,000 to city recreation programs.

[City officials] said they never asked the Cardinals for documentation, until the Post-Dispatch called recently.

Fortunately, it seems that the team had worked to meet most of its contractual obligations. After the Post-Dispatch inquiry, the team sent the newspaper a spreadsheet showing that it had exceeded the benchmarks.

However, there is some dispute about the profit-sharing clause. In January, as reporter David Hunn recounts, one of the team’s owners sold 13 percent of the team. The Cardinals’ attorney said that the owner did not make a profit on the sale, meaning that no money is owed to the city.

Of course, no city official has bothered to investigate the matter. As Hunn writes, “They trust the Cardinals.”

If city officials aren’t bothering to monitor this agreement, what else aren’t they checking up on? There are certainly many tax incentive deals in both Saint Louis and elsewhere in the state. Governments hand out millions upon millions of targeted tax incentives all the time.

Not only are those handouts bad policy from an economic standpoint, there is the possibility, as in Saint Louis city, that government officials won’t even bother to try to make sure that tax incentive agreements are followed. Not that you needed another one, but this is one more reason we should let free competition, not government favoritism, determine profits.

P.S. — At least Saint Louis isn’t making debt payments on a non-existent stadium.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

Audrey Spalding

More about this author >
    Footer Logo
    Support the Show-Me-Institute
    Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Donate
    • About
    • Contact

    Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected]

    Mission Statement
    Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

    © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved