• Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications
    • Essay
    • Case Study
    • Policy Study
    • Report
    • Testimony
    • Other
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Economy / Taxes

Justin’s Post About Property Assessments and the Three L’s

By David Stokes on Apr 7, 2008

Justin blogged last week about the property assessment and tax changes coming from the general assembly. Reading it was the the only three minutes of vacation that made me wish I was back at work in order to respond more quickly. Justin’s post is rife with an error that is, not surprisingly, fairly common at a think tank such as this: too much theory and not enough practicality. To his credit, he does wonder that he may be missing the point, to which I will respond (in all caps, to emphasize the seriousness of it, but without any anger) that PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS HAVE NEVER BEEN INTENDED TO LEAD TO TAX INCREASES. The system is supposed to use assessments as a method to allow local governments to set the proper and necessary rate — not to set a rate and then let the tax money roll in through assessment increases, which is what has happened.

It might be reasonable in theory to say that because people don’t complain when their assessments and taxes go down, they shouldn’t complain when they go up — but because the former happens so rarely in Missouri, it is not a practical argument. Furthermore, taxing districts are protected from a decrease in assessments in those rare cases (which we may actually see in the 2009 reassessment, because of the terrible real estate market we are in) so that’s just further proof that it does not happen both ways.

As to less prosperous neighborhoods subsidizing booming neighborhoods with an average system as I have proposed, all I can say is I only wish the system was so consistent as to make that a legitimate concern. The problem people have is with the herky-jerky nature of the comparable sales system, where there is absolutely no consistency between homes in an area. The St. Louis County assessor’s office does a good job of getting the numbers right, for the most part, in the countywide aggregate, but everyone involved with the process knows there is a tremendous amount of variance at the smaller levels of blocks and neighborhoods. Outstate, where they have elected assessors and don’t have certificate-of-value filings, the same thing works in reverse and leads to inconsistently lower property values. My average-based proposal addresses the inconsistency within the entire process, which is one of the primary problems people have with the entire system. And I would keep the appeal process, precisely to avoid homes that have not increased in value from subsidizing those that have.

The reforms coming out of the general assemply are long overdue, and I commend the assembly for taking on this issue.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

David Stokes

Director of Municipal Policy

More about this author >
    Footer Logo
    Support the Show-Me-Institute
    Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
    • Publications
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Donate
    • About
    • Contact

    Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected]

    Mission Statement
    Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

    © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved