Michael Rathbone
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch recently published an article lamenting the fact that Missouri has the nation's lowest taxes on cigarettes. They are not alone; the Kansas City Star editorial that I wrote about on April 3 pushed for the state to raise the cigarette tax. The Post-Dispatch and Star articles differ on the reasons they want the cigarette tax increased;  however, does it occur to people that there might be negative consequences to raising the cigarette tax?

For instance, stores in Missouri that are on the border with other states attract business from people shopping here in order to take advantage of the state's low excise taxes. Show-Me Institute intern Amy Lutz recently wrote an op-ed that details the impact such a tax hike could have on interstate commerce.

Also, an increased tax on cigarettes would disproportionately harm the poor. The Post-Dispatch article mentions that raising taxes is an effective method for getting people to quit smoking. Do increased cigarette taxes result in significantly fewer smokers? If smoking is bad for us, and it is OK to increase taxes on that, where does it end? What next, enormous taxes on sugar to finance heavy broccoli subsidies? What about an obesity tax? Isn’t there something offensive about government micromanaging our lives?

About the Author

Michael Rathbone
Policy Researcher
Michael Rathbone was a policy researcher at the Show-Me Institute. He is a native of Saint Louis and a 2008 graduate of Saint Louis University, where he earned a bachelor of science degree in biomedical engineering.