• Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • MOGE
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • MOGE
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
×

Health Care / Free-Market Reform

No Surprise: Health Care Spending Accelerated in 2014

By Patrick Ishmael on Jan 29, 2016

One of the most ballyhooed promises of Obamacare was the law's supposed effect on Americans' health care spending. Frequent talk of the law "bending the cost curve down" was intended to allay concerns on both sides of the aisle that the Affordable Care Act would actually make health care more expensive for individuals in the private market and the government itself.

Supporters of the law claimed this wouldn't be the case, but data released late last year by the Office of the Actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) show very clearly that, again, they were wrong.

Although the ACA was enacted in 2010, its most significant provisions went into effect in 2014. The expansion of Medicaid eligibility, as well as health insurance premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies paid by the federal government, contributed to federal government health care spending growth of 11.7 percent in 2014 — 8.2 percentage points faster than in 2013. Correspondingly, the federal government’s share of health care spending increased from 26.0 percent in 2013 to 28.0 percent in 2014.
 
Other provisions of the ACA that took effect prior to 2014 continued to affect overall health spending — including changes to Medicare and Medicaid provider payments, increased Medicaid prescription drug rebates, reductions to the size of the Medicare Part D coverage gap, prescription drug industry fees, and implementation of the medical loss ratio requirement for private insurers.
 
For regular readers of our work, CMS's findings will come as no surprise. In our paper on direct primary care, released last year, we detailed how health care costs for both the government and for private individuals were going up in all sorts of ways: through mandated coverage, higher premiums, bigger deductibles, less-generous copays, and other cost-transferring practices. From the very beginning, the mechanics of Obamacare clearly pointed to significantly increased, not decreased, health care spending in the United States; the results since its passage bear out that very straightforward reality.
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

Patrick Ishmael

Director of Government Accountability

More about this author >
Footer Logo
Support the Show-Me-Institute
Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected].

Mission Statement
Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved