• Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • MOGE
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Show Me InstituteShow Me Institute
Support the Show-Me Institute
  • Publications and Model Policy
    • Blueprint for Missouri
    • Model Policy
    • MOGE
    • Report
      • Case Study
      • Policy Study
      • Essay
    • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Testimony
    • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Daily Blog
    • Podcasts and Radio
    • Video
    • Infographics
    • Commentary / Op-Eds
    • Events
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Show-Me Institute Board of Directors
    • Fellows and Scholars
    • Our Authors
    • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Explore Topics
    • Education
      • Accountability
      • Education Finance
      • Performance
      • School Choice
      • The Missouri School Rankings Project
    • Health Care
      • Free-Market Reform
      • Medicaid
    • Corporate Welfare
      • Special Taxing Districts
      • Subsidies
      • Tax Credits
    • Labor
      • Government Unions
      • Public Pensions
    • State and Local Government
      • Budget and Spending
      • Courts
      • Criminal Justice
      • Municipal Policy
      • Property Rights
      • Transparency
      • Transportation
    • Economy
      • Business Climate
      • Energy
      • Minimum Wage
      • Privatization
      • Regulation
      • Taxes
      • Welfare
      • Workforce
×

Education

Is Democracy Too Messy for the Post-Dispatch Editorial Board?

By James V. Shuls on Jun 9, 2015

Government IconYesterday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch released an editorial titled, “Republicans continue to peddle the Common Core lie.” A more appropriate title for the piece might have been, “Democracy is too messy for our refined tastes.” Rather than tackle any of the substantive arguments about the Common Core—Are they rigorous? Do they promote constructivist teaching practices? Was the federal government overly involved in adoption? etc.—the editorial team focused on denouncing legislative attacks on Common Core because they don’t actually remove Common Core. Of course, given their support for the standards, the editorial board likely would have been just as derisive had the legislature been 100 percent effective in removing the standards.

Thus far, the legislature has passed a bill which created workgroups tasked with developing new standards. I happen to be serving on the K-5 math standards group. The purpose of these groups is to come up with standards that have been created with the input of a wide swath of Missourians from varying backgrounds. If standards consist of the things we are going to teach our kids, everyone should have input. Now, this might mean that we have contradictory opinions and impassioned debate, but that is a good thing. That means the process has been inclusive and a wide range of views are being represented.

Sure, the Common Core sailed through the state department of education with little commotion, but that is not a good thing! They were not developed through an open, public process, but behind closed doors. This better, more inclusive process is going to take time. That is OK.

The legislature’s decision to remove funding for Common Core-aligned tests particularly drew the editorial board’s ire. The Post-Dispatch’seditorial board looks at these developments and says, “This is how we do education policy in the U.S. One step forward, two steps back.”

Regardless of whether the steps have been forward or back, the editorial board is right. This is how education policy works in the U.S. Our system of government is designed with checks and balances on purpose. These are not quirks, but features of the system designed to limit any one group’s ability, such as Common Core supporters, to railroad the entire population. These are exactly the features that were subverted through the development and adoption of the Common Core standards.

Our Democratic system can be messy at times, and it can frustrate well-intentioned central planners who wish to impose their will on us all, but this is an example of it working appropriately.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
About the author

James V. Shuls

Senior Fellow of Education Policy

More about this author >
Footer Logo
Support the Show-Me-Institute
Showmeinstitute.org is brought to you by Show-Me Institute and Show-Me Opportunity.
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Reprint permission for Show-Me Institute publications and commentaries is hereby granted, provided that proper credit is given to the author. We request, but do not require, that those who reprint our material notify us of publication for our records: [email protected].

Mission Statement
Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy.

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved